By: Bangshidhar Goswami
Ex-Assistant Professor, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Ran Vijay Singh College of Engineering and Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
The leather industry, known for its extensive use of chemical processes, is undergoing a significant transformation with the introduction of sustainable practices and bio-derived materials. This study explores advancements in the chemical synthesis and reactions involved in leather production, focusing on both traditional and innovative approaches. Traditional tanning processes, which often involve chromium and other chemicals, are contrasted with emerging bio-leather technologies that utilize renewable resources to minimize environmental impact. The paper delves into the chemical mechanisms of conventional tanning methods, their efficacy, and their environmental implications, including challenges related to waste management and pollutant control. In parallel, the study examines the synthesis of bio-leather from bio-derived raw materials, evaluating its chemical properties, performance, and sustainability compared to conventional leather. Key aspects such as material composition, reaction pathways, and the physical and chemical properties of bio-leather are discussed. The research also highlights the effectiveness of various bio-based tanning agents and their potential to replace traditional chemicals, thereby reducing the ecological footprint of leather production. The findings underscore the importance of integrating sustainable practices in the leather industry and provide insights into the chemical innovations driving this transition. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and development in leather synthesis, emphasizing the need for continued exploration of green chemistry solutions to achieve a more sustainable and environment-friendly leather industry.
Citation:
Refrences:
1. Rao JR, Chandrasekaran B, Sreeram KJ, Nair BU, Ramasami T. Green chemistry in leather processing: a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2012;19(7):2445–2450.
2. van der Borght M, van Heusden B, van Raemdonck E, De Smet M, Vanrompay D, Devlieghere F. Development and application of sustainable processes for leather production. J Clean Prod. 2021;289:125690.
3. Covington AD. Modern tanning chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 1997;26(2):111–126.
4. Moreira RL, Araújo CD, Antunes OC, Castro IM, Fraga SR, Silva AR. Bio-based alternatives to leather tanning processes: a review. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;101:161–168.
5. Thanikaivelan P, Rao JR, Nair BU, Ramasami T. Progress and recent trends in biotechnological methods for leather processing. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22(4):181–188.
6. Li Q, Zhang X, Zhan Y, Yang L, Wang Z. Evaluation of bio-leather synthesized from renewable resources: performance and sustainability. Polymers. 2020;12(9):2037.
7. Egli T, Lienemann P, Luch A, Meierhofer R, Schindler M. Alternatives to chromium-tanned leather: a review. Environ Int. 2003;29(5):683–689.
8. Dahiya A, Kamble S, Koli VK. Bio-tanning: sustainable approach in leather manufacturing. J Clean Prod. 2018;174:902–909.
9. Yu Z, Huang J, Sun Y, Huang W, Liu X. A comparative study on the performance of traditional and bio-based leather tanning agents. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;15:300–308.
10. Sreeram KJ, Rao JR. Recent trends in sustainable leather processing. Green Chem. 2009;11(7):1008–1016.
11. Fratini E, Carucci C, Lenzi C, De Marchi L, Ottaviani MF. The role of green chemistry in the future of leather production. J Environ Manag. 2020;261:110232.
12. Heidemann E. Fundamentals of leather manufacturing. Darmstadt: Eduard Roether Verlag; 1993.
13. Schroeder HF, Boon J, Harrison R. The environmental impact of leather production: a review. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36(5):1092–1096.
14. Marmer WN, Dudley RL, Brown EM. Alternatives to chromium tanning: vegetable and synthetic tannages. J Am Leather Chem Assoc. 2001;96(6):222–228.
15. Oliveira FR, Pantoja L, Silva CV, Menezes RR, Passos ML, Marques PA. Comparative analysis of chromium and bio-leather tanning technologies. J Hazard Mater. 2013;262:1247–1253.
