By: Gaurav Singh Bisht and Ajay Singh
1Scholar, Department of Chemistry, School of Applied and Life Sciences Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
2Dean of Research (SALS), Department of Chemistry, School of Applied and Life Sciences Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
This study focuses on the process of isolating cellulose from organic waste material and using it with red mud to create nanocomposites, with an emphasis on possible uses. After extraction, red mud is used as a reinforcing filler, and cellulose is added to nanocomposites using a simple synthesis technique. Red mud is a byproduct of refining alumina and has special qualities, such as large surface area and mineral content, that make it appropriate for use in nanocomposite applications. Red mud and cellulose work together to provide improved mechanical, thermal, and barrier qualities in the resultant nanocomposites. We also investigate several possible uses for these cellulose-based nanocomposites, from biomedical devices to packaging materials. Using cellulose made from organic waste not only increases the value of an otherwise underused resource but also helps to lower pollution levels in the environment. Additionally, red mud’s integration into nanocomposites reduces the environmental effect of its storage while providing a sustainable method of disposal. Overall, this study emphasizes the viability and sustainability of using red mud and cellulose from organic waste to create nanocomposites, as well as the prospective uses of these materials in a variety of disciplines. By supporting further efforts to manage waste and use resources sustainably, this study opens the door for the creation of environmentally friendly materials with useful uses.
Citation:
Refrences:
1. A. Bhatnagar, V. J. Vilar, C. M. Botelho and R. A. Boaventura, Environmental technology 2011, 32, 231–249.
2. M. Jitjaicham and B. Kusuktham, Indian Journal of Materials Science 2016, 2016.
3. L. Y. Liu Ying, L. A. Liu AiLu, S. Ibrahim, Y. H. Yang Hong and H. W. Huang Wen, 2018.
4. C. He, H. Li, O. Huan, H. Wei, H. Xiong, H. Ni and M. Zheng, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2022, 46, e17071.
5. N. Yongvanich, Journal of Natural Fibers 2015, 12, 323–331.
6. J. Liu, Y. Yu, S. Zhu, J. Yang, J. Song, W. Fan, H. Yu, D. Bian and M. Huo, PLoS One 2018, 13, e0191229.
7. M. Wang and X. Liu, Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 408, 124420.
8. M. Khodakarami and M. Bagheri, Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 296, 126404.
9. L. Liu, Z. Y. Gao, X. P. Su, X. Chen, L. Jiang and J. M. Yao, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2015, 3, 432–442.
10. B. Azimi, S. Sepahvand, S. Ismaeilimoghadam, H. Kargarzadeh, A. Ashori, M. Jonoobi and S. Danti, Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2024, 32, 345–366.
11. V. K. Thakur and S. I. Voicu, Carbohydrate polymers 2016, 146, 148–165.
12. L.-r. Tang, B. Huang, W. Ou, X.-r. Chen and Y.-d. Chen, Bioresource technology 2011, 102, 10973 10977.
13. Ş. Sungur and S. Babaoğlu, Separation science and technology 2005, 40, 2067–2078.
14. F. Galiano, K. Briceño, T. Marino, A. Molino, K. V. Christensen and A. Figoli, Journal of Membrane Science 2018, 564, 562–586.
15. A. Sharma, M. Thakur, M. Bhattacharya, T. Mandal and S. Goswami, Biotechnology Reports 2019, 21, e00316.
