A Comparative Study of the Wind Load Effect on High-Rise Buildings

Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Structural Engineering and Analysis
Received Date: 05/31/2024
Acceptance Date: 06/04/2024
Published On: 2024-06-05
First Page: 15
Last Page: 21

Journal Menu

By: Pagade Rahul Ramdas and D.B. Mohite

1Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Chh. Shahu College of Engineering Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
2Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Chh. Shahu College of Engineering Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Tall buildings are going up all over the world, so it increases the importance of design for wind-induced
building motion. Tall structures that comply with lateral drift requirements specified in building codes
can still experience significant swaying under strong wind conditions. Severe wind-related disasters in
India and the United States have highlighted the fact that many existing buildings are not entirely wind-resistant. This underscores the need to reevaluate and enhance the computational techniques currently
used to determine along-wind loads. This paper examines methods for calculating wind load using the
gust factor method. The analysis focuses on a G+17 RCC high-rise building, considering the effects of
wind load on its structural integrity. By employing the gust factor method, this study aims to provide a
comprehensive understanding of wind load impacts and improve the design and resilience of high-rise
buildings against strong winds. change in zones 3 and 5 and terrain categories 3 and 4 and analyzed
for story drift ratio, bending moment, shear force, gust factor, and gust pressure as per the unrevised
and revised code by using ETABS-2016. Results are plotted graphically to study the pattern of variation
in story drift ratio, bending moment, shear force, gust factor, and gust pressure. Comparisons are made
with results obtained from the software, and it was observed that the IS: 875 Part 3-2015 gives more
sensitive and accurate values as compared to the IS: 875 Part 3-1987 and the value is approximately
30% to 40% higher for the revised code.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Pagade Rahul Ramdas and D.B. Mohite, A Comparative Study of the Wind Load Effect on High-Rise Buildings. International Journal of Structural Engineering and Analysis. 2024; 10(1): 15-21p.

How to cite this URL: Pagade Rahul Ramdas and D.B. Mohite, A Comparative Study of the Wind Load Effect on High-Rise Buildings. International Journal of Structural Engineering and Analysis. 2024; 10(1): 15-21p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/a-comparative-study-of-the-wind-load-effect-on-high-rise-buildings/

Refrences:

1. Heiza KM, Tayel MA. Comparative study of the effects of wind and earthquake loads on high-rise
buildings. Concr Res Lett. 2012;3(1):386–405.
2. Ajitha B, Naik MN. The wind and seismic analysis on different heights of building by using
ETABS. Asian Rev Civ Eng. 2016;5(2):19–16. doi:10.51983/tarce-2016.5.2.2229.
3. Kalra M, Bajpai P, Singh D. Effect of wind on multi-story buildings of different shapes. Ind J Sci
Technol. 2016;9(48):1–5. doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i48/105705.
4. Okafor CV, Okolie KC, Cyril ME, Okafor CP. Analysis of wind effect on high-rise building for
different terrain category. EurJ Eng Res Sci. 2017;2(12):23–30. doi:10.24018/ejeng.2017.2.12.550.
5. Raju KR, Shereef MI, Iyer NR, Gopalakrishnan S. Analysis and design of RC tall building subjected
to wind and earthquake loads. The Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering. Chennai,
India. 2013, Dec 10–14. 844–852. doi:10.3850/978-981-07-8012-8 166.
6. Yagaanbuant D, Radnaabazar K. Some design issues of high-rise buildings. International Forum on
Strategic Technology. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. 2007, Oct 03-06. IEEE. 125–127. doi:10.1109/
IFOST.2007.4798537.
7. Zaidee SRA, Alsalmani AH. Deterministic analysis of wind loads effects on high-rise buildings. J
Eng. 2015;21(4):123–137.
8. Chandradhara GP, Vikram MB. Effect of wind load on the aspect ratio of the building. J Mech Civ
Eng. 2014;45–49.
9. Mashalkar BS, Patil GR, Jadhav AS. Effect of plan shapes on the response of buildings subjected
to wind vibrations. J Mech Civ Eng. 2015;80–89.
10. Code of practice for design load (other than earthquake) for building and structure (IS:
875:1987(Part-3)). Bureau of Indian Standard. New Delhi.
11. Design loads (Other than Earthquake) for buildings and structures – Code of practice (IS:
875:2015(Part-3)). Bureau of Indian Standard. New Delhi.
12. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (IS: 1893:2002 (Part-1)). Bureau of Indian
Standard. New Delhi.