Development of a Framework to Improve Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics Using ISM for Food Industries

Volume: 10 | Issue: 01 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Industrial Biotechnology and Biomaterials
Received Date: 01/19/2024
Acceptance Date: 02/29/2024
Published On: 2024-03-16
First Page: 1
Last Page: 10

Journal Menu

By: Ashish Patel, Kuldip Nagera, and Anjana R


The goal of this study is to look to the most important sustainable practices that fresh food start ups can use to improve their resilience and environmental responsibility. It also aims to identify the difficulties and impediments these companies face when putting these sustainable strategies into effect. Fresh food startups can integrate several sustainable techniques and innovations into their operations, as identified by the study. These include using IoT technology to enhance supply chain management and implementing packaging with a modified environment to keep goods fresher for longer. Advances have improved product attributes, uniformity, and consistency as a result of increases in quality control capabilities afforded by A Food monitoring system based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and Internet of Things of all phases of industrial manufacturing processes. This paper is a review of some of the more important and modern applications that have been of greatest benefit to the humankind The review also emphasizes the difficulties these firms have had putting these strategies into practice. The structural framework is developed by adopting an interpretive structural modeling approach. Furthermore, fuzzy-MICMAC approach is applied to compute the driving and the dependence power of each selected enabler. This study develops a structural framework that indicates the improved supply chain performance is achieved by “development of supply chain Transportation system”, “strong customer relationship management”, and “enhancement in control over cost quality and Process of sustainability” as the most critical enablers. The enablers for the development of the framework are obtained through the inputs from an expert panel. However, the researchers may conduct large-scale surveys to strengthen the input components of the framework. This is one of the unique studies that list a set of 15 most critical e-business process and sustainability based enablers to improve supply chain performance.

Keywords: Sustainable manufacturing, Supply Chain Management, SMSCM Enablers, Survey, ISM, fuzzy MICMAC



How to cite this article: Ashish Patel, Kuldip Nagera, and Anjana R, Development of a Framework to Improve Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics Using ISM for Food Industries. International Journal of Industrial Biotechnology and Biomaterials. 2024; 10(01): 1-10p.

How to cite this URL: Ashish Patel, Kuldip Nagera, and Anjana R, Development of a Framework to Improve Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics Using ISM for Food Industries. International Journal of Industrial Biotechnology and Biomaterials. 2024; 10(01): 1-10p. Available from:


  1. Achmad AL, Chaerani D, Perdana T. Designing a food supply chain strategy during COVID-19 pandemic using an integrated Agent-Based Modelling and Robust Optimization. Heliyon. 2021 Nov 1;7(11).
  2. Bhowmik C, Bhowmik S, Ray A. Green energy sources selection for sustainable planning: a case study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2020 Apr 30;69(4):1322-34.
  3. Behl A. Antecedents to firm performance and competitiveness using the lens of big data analytics: a cross-cultural study. Management Decision. 2022 Feb 2;60(2):368-98.
  4. Dora M, Kumar A, Mangla SK, Pant A, Kamal MM. Critical success factors influencing artificial intelligence adoption in food supply chains. International Journal of Production Research. 2022 Jul 18;60(14):4621-40.
  5. Dubey R, Bryde DJ, Dwivedi YK, Graham G, Foropon C. Impact of artificial intelligence-driven big data analytics culture on agility and resilience in humanitarian supply chain: A practice-based view. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022 Aug 1;250:108618.
  6. Garcia-Torres S, Albareda L, Rey-Garcia M, Seuring S. Traceability for sustainability–literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2019 Mar 4;24(1):85-106.
  7. Hechelmann RH, Seevers JP, Otte A, Sponer J, Stark M. Renewable energy integration for steam supply of industrial processes—a food processing case study. Energies. 2020 May 16;13(10):2532.
  8. Krishna G, Ulmer J. Just-In-Time: An Industrial Analysis. 2020;4. Available from:
  9. Gorane SJ, Kant R. Modelling the SCM enablers: an integrated ISM‐fuzzy MICMAC approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2013 Mar 29;25(2):263-86.
  10. Haleem A, Sushil, Qadri MA, Kumar S. Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: an application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning & Control. 2012 Oct 1;23(10-11):722-34.
  11. Hsiao SW, Ko YC, Lo CH, Chen SH. An ISM, DEI, and ANP based approach for product family development. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2013 Jan 1;27(1):131-48.
  12. Habidin NF, Salleh MI, Md Latip NA, Azman MN, Mohd Fuzi N. Lean six sigma performance improvement tool for automotive suppliers. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering. 2016 May 18;33(4):215-35.
  13. Hartini S, Ciptomulyono U. The relationship between lean and sustainable manufacturing on performance: literature review. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015 Jan 1;4:38-45.
  14. Nicoletti B. Lean Six Sigma and digitize procurement. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2013 May 31;4(2):184-203.
  15. Ashok Sarkar S, Ranjan Mukhopadhyay A, Ghosh SK. Improvement of claim processing cycle time through Lean Six Sigma methodology. International journal of lean six sigma. 2013 May 31;4(2):171-83.
  16. Ping Yi T, Jeng Feng C, Prakash J, Wei Ping L. Reducing electronic component losses in lean electronics assembly with Six Sigma approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2012 Aug 3;3(3):206-30.
  17. Mallidis I, Dekker R, Vlachos D. The impact of greening on supply chain design and cost: a case for a developing region. Journal of Transport Geography. 2012 May 1;22:118-28.
  18. Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK. Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2014 Jun;15:113-30.
  19. Mani V, Gunasekaran A, Delgado C. Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018 Jan 1;195:259-72.
  20. Pagell M, Shevchenko A. Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of supply chain management. 2014 Jan;50(1):44-55.
  21. Sarkis J. A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply chain management: an international journal. 2012 Mar 9;17(2):202-16.
  22. Schaltegger S, Burritt R. Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chains: Review and sustainability supply chain management framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2014 May 6;19(3):232-41.
  23. Lertwattanapongchai S, William Swierczek F. Assessing the change process of Lean Six Sigma: a case analysis. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2014 Oct 28;5(4):423-43.
  24. Manville G, Greatbanks R, Krishnasamy R, Parker DW. Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma programmes: a view from middle management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2012 Jan 6;29(1):7-20.
  25. Martinez D, Gitlow HS. Optimizing employee time in a purchasing department: a Six Sigma case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2011 May 31;2(2):180-90.
  26. Tachizawa E, Yew Wong C. Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2014 Sep 2;19(5/6):643-63.