Investigating the Impact of Silicate Modification on Polypropylene-Layered Silicate Nanocomposite

Volume: 10 | Issue: 01 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Nanomaterials and Nanostructures
Received Date: 07/17/2024
Acceptance Date: 07/24/2024
Published On: 2024-07-25
First Page: 47
Last Page: 54

Journal Menu

By: Haydar U. Zaman

Abstract

In this research, a co-rotating twin-screw extruder was used to create polypropylene/organo-layered silicate nanocomposites based on organo-muscovite. In the nanocomposite system, compatibilizers such as polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride and potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride were employed. The morphological, mechanical, thermal, and rheological characteristics of polypropylene/polypropylene graftedmaleicanhydride/organo-muscovite & polypropylene/potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride/organo-muscovite nanocomposites were investigated in relation to the effects of layered silicate modification and compatibilizers. The availability of polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride or potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleicanhydride allowed for the intercalation of organo-muscovite, which might partially exfoliate during mixing, according to TEM micrographs. Using potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride instead of polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride improved the exfoliation and distribution of organo-muscovite. It has been noted that compared to polypropylene/polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride/organo-muscovite nanocomposites, polypropylene/potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride/organo-muscovite nanocomposites exhibit superior overall mechanical properties. This was due in part to the fact that scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were expected toshow adhesion that was more favorable than that of polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride due to the compatibilization impact of potassium succinate modification. The study of differential scanning calorimetry suggests an increase in crystallinity, melting point, and crystallization temperature. Additionally, the rheological behaviors of nanocomposites are enhanced by the addition of potassium succinate modified polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride or polypropylene grafted maleicanhydride with organo-muscovite.


Keywords: Nanocomposites, polypropylene, organically modified layered silicate, compatibilizer, morphology, thermal properties

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Haydar U. Zaman, Investigating the Impact of Silicate Modification on Polypropylene-Layered Silicate Nanocomposite. International Journal of Nanomaterials and Nanostructures. 2024; 10(01): 47-54p.

How to cite this URL: Haydar U. Zaman, Investigating the Impact of Silicate Modification on Polypropylene-Layered Silicate Nanocomposite. International Journal of Nanomaterials and Nanostructures. 2024; 10(01): 47-54p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijnn-v10i01-8393/

Refrences:

1. Zaman HU, Hun PD, Khan RAYoon K-B. Comparison of effect of surface-modified micro-/nano-mineral fillers filling in the polypropylene matrix. J Thermopl Compos Mater. 2013; 26 (8): 1100-1113.
2. Mukhopadhyay R, Bhaduri D, Sarkar B, Rusmin R et al. Clay–polymer nanocomposites: Progress and challenges for use in sustainable water treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2020; 383: 121125.
3. Yuan W, Guo M, Miao ZLiu Y. Influence of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene on the dispersion of clay in polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Polym J. 2010; 42 (9): 745-751.
4. Tarapow J, Bernal CRAlvarez VA. Mechanical properties of polypropylene/claynanocomposites: effect of  clay content, polymer/clay compatibility, and processing conditions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2009; 111 (2): 768-778.
5. Hammami I, Hammami H, Soulestin J, Arous M et al. Thermal and dielectric behavior of polyamide-6/clay nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys. 2019; 232: 99-108.
6. Tan H, Wang L, Wen X, Deng L et al. Insight into the influence of polymer topological structure on the exfoliation of clay in polystyrene matrix via annealing process. Appl Clay Sci. 2020; 194: 105708.
7. Kodali D, Uddin M-J, Moura EARangari VK. Mechanical and thermal properties of modified Georgian and Brazilian clay infused biobased epoxy nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys. 2020; 257: 123821.
8. Rigail-Cedeño A, Schmidt DF, Vera G, Chavez M et al. Elastomeric bio-based epoxy/clay nanocomposites. AIP Publishing LLC, p. 020043.
9. Irandoost M, Pezeshki-Modaress MJavanbakht V. Removal of lead from aqueous solution with nanofibrous nanocomposite of polycaprolactone adsorbent modified by nanoclay and nanozeolite. J Water Proces Eng. 2019; 32: 100981.
10. López-Quintanilla M, Sánchez-Valdés S, Ramos de Valle LMedellín-Rodríguez F. Effect of some compatibilizing agents on clay dispersion of polypropylene-clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006; 100 (6): 4748-4756.
11. Casalini T, Rossi F, Santoro MPerale G. Structural characterization of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly (glycolic acid)(PGA) oligomers. Intern J Molecul Sci. 2011; 12 (6): 3857-3870.
12. Bunekar N, Tsai T-Y, Huang J-YChen S-J. Investigation of thermal, mechanical and gas barrier properties of polypropylene-modified clay nanocomposites by micro- compounding process. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng. 2018; 88: 252-260.
13. Wu M-H, Wang C-CChen C-Y. Preparation of high melt strength polypropylene by addition of an ionically modified polypropylene. Polym. 2020; 202: 122743.
14. Chen WC, Lai SMChen CM. Preparation and properties of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer/clay nanocomposites: I. Effect of clay content and compatibilizer types. Polym Intern. 2008; 57 (3): 515-522.
15. Zhong W, Qiao X, Sun K, Zhang G et al. Polypropylene-clay blends compatibilized with MAH-g-POE. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006; 99 (5): 2558-2564.