Physico-Mechanical and Degradation Properties on Agro-Waste Based Polymer Composites Reinforced with Banana Bunch Fiber

Volume: 10 | Issue: 02 | Year 2024 | Subscription

Received Date:
Acceptance Date:
Published On: 2024-10-14
First Page:
Last Page:

Journal Menu

By: Haydar U. Zaman and Md. Abu Sayed

1Assist. Prof., Department of Physics, National University of Bangladesh Institute of Radiation and Polymer Technology, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box-3787, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2*Assist. Prof., Department of Chemistry, National University College of Bangladesh

Abstract

The usage of banana bunch fibers in polymer composite parts for the automotive, aerospace, and construction industries is growing. As people grow more aware of the danger of synthetic fibers, banana bunch fibers are being used in an increasing variety of sectors. It is important to recognize that humans depend on the Earth for survival, not the other way around. This understanding drives scientists and policymakers to seek alternatives to traditional materials, prioritizing environmentally friendly options for a more sustainable future.. Better thermomechanical properties, less carbon dioxide emissions, ease of manufacturing, biodegradability and recycling potential, and improved compatibility with human health are just a few of the sustainable features that make banana bunch fibers superior to synthetic materials. As a result, fibers from banana bunches are frequently used to modify polymers. In this study, polypropylene (PP) composites reinforced with banana bunch fiber were fabricated using compression molding. In some applications, stearic acid (SA) was used as a coupling agent, while in others, it was not applied. Raw banana bunch fiber was used to construct composites with filler loading levels ranging from 10 to 40 weight percent. The mechanical properties of the resulting composites were evaluated through a series of tests.. Composites reinforced with 30% fiber showed the best mechanical performance based on fiber loading. SA was chemically added to increase banana bunch fiber and boost its compatibility with the polymer matrix. When compared to the untreated composites, the mechanical properties of the banana bunch fiber reinforced composites that underwent SA treatment were better. To gain further understanding of the fiber-matrix adhesion, the researchers utilized scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on the tensile fractured samples. This technique provided detailed images to analyze the interaction between the fibers and the polymer matrix.These photos demonstrated how the SA treatment improved the banana bunch fiber’s adherence to the PP matrix. The composites were also examined for their moisture absorption capacity and their ability to simulate weathering conditions. These tests aimed to assess the durability and environmental resilience of the materials.

Keywords: Composite, stearic acid, banana bunch fiber, polypropylene, mechanical properties

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Haydar U. Zaman and Md. Abu Sayed, Physico-Mechanical and Degradation Properties on Agro-Waste Based Polymer Composites Reinforced with Banana Bunch Fiber. . 2024; 10(02): -p.

How to cite this URL: Haydar U. Zaman and Md. Abu Sayed, Physico-Mechanical and Degradation Properties on Agro-Waste Based Polymer Composites Reinforced with Banana Bunch Fiber. . 2024; 10(02): -p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/physico-mechanical-and-degradation-properties-on-agro-waste-based-polymer-composites-reinforced-with-banana-bunch-fiber/

Refrences:

  1. Rana A, Mandal A, et al. Short jute fiber‐reinforced polypropylene composites: Effect of compatibilizer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;69:329-338.
  2. Tajvidi M, Ebrahimi G. Water uptake and mechanical characteristics of natural filler–polypropylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;88:941-946.
  3. Zhou X, Li R, et al. Reinforcement of polypropylene using sisal fibers grafted with poly (methyl methacrylate). Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;88:1055-1064.
  4. Mohanty AK, Misra M, et al. Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. Journal of Polymer Environment. 2002;10:19-26.
  5. Puglia D, Biagiotti J, et al. A review on natural fibre-based composites-Part II: Application of natural reinforcements in composite materials for automotive industry. Journal of Natural Fibers. 2005;1:23-65.
  6. Nikmatin S, Hermawan B, et al. Kinematics and dynamics of the ballistic impact behavior for an oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber reinforced bio-composite. Bioresources. 2020;15:6123-6134.
  7. Zaman HU, Khan MA, et al. Banana fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: A study of the physico-mechanical properties. Fibers and Polymers. 2013;14:121-126.
  8. Roy JK, Akter N, et al. Preparation and properties of coir fiber-reinforced ethylene glycol dimethacrylate-based composite. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2014;27:35-51.
  9. Nourbakhsh A, Ashori A, et al. Mechanical and thermo-chemical properties of wood-flour/polypropylene blends. Polymer Bulletin. 2010;65:691-700.
  10. Zaman HU, Khan RA, et al. Physico-mechanical and degradation properties of biodegradable photografted coir fiber with acrylic monomers. Polymer Bulletin. 2013;70:2277-2290.
  11. Zeng H, Leng J, et al. Modeling the thermomechanical behaviors of short fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2020;166:105212.
  12. Hintermann M. Automotive exterior parts from natural fibers. RIKO-2005. 2005.
  13. Bledzki AK, Faruk O, et al. Cars from renewable materials. Kompozyty. 2010;10:282-288.
  14. Kumar S, Misra R. Analysis of Banana Fibers Reinforced Low‐density Polyethylene/Poly (Є‐caprolactone) Composites. Soft Materials. 2007;4:1-13.
  15. Venkateshwaran N, Elayaperumal A. Banana fiber reinforced polymer composites-a review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2010;29:2387-2396.
  16. Reyes J, Albano C, et al. Effects of gamma irradiation on polypropylene, polypropylene+ high density polyethylene and polypropylene+ high density polyethylene+ wood flour. Material Research Innovations. 2001;4:294-300.
  17. Karian H: Handbook of polypropylene and polypropylene composites, revised and expanded, CRC press; 2003.
  18. Herrera-Franco P, Valadez-Gonzalez A. A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2005;36:597-608.
  19. Bledzki A, Mamun A, et al. The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. Express Polymer Letters. 2008;2:413-422.
  20. Pizzi A, Eaton N. The structure of cellulose by conformational analysis. Part 5. The cellulose Ii water sorption isothermXS. Journal of Macromolecular Science-Chemistry. 1987;24:1065-1084.
  21. Bledzki A, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Progress in Polymer Science. 1999;24:221-274.
  22. Sreekala M, Thomas S. Effect of fibre surface modification on water-sorption characteristics of oil palm fibres. Composites Science and Technology. 2003;63:861-869.
  23. John MJ, Francis B, et al. Effect of chemical modification on properties of hybrid fiber biocomposites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2008;39:352-363.
  24. Li X, Tabil LG, et al. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. Journal of Polymer Environment. 2007;15:25-33.
  25. Kim H, Biswas J, et al. Effects of stearic acid coating on zeolite in LDPE, LLDPE, and HDPE composites. Polymer. 2006;47:3981-3992.
  26. Bellayer S, Tavard E, et al. Mechanism of intumescence of a polyethylene/calcium carbonate/stearic acid system. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2009;94:797-803.
  27. Patil Y, Gajre B, et al. Effect of maleic anhydride treatment on steam and water absorption of wood polymer composites prepared from wheat straw, cane bagasse, and teak wood sawdust using novolac as matrix. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2000;77:2963-2967.
  28. Karmaker A, Hoffmann A, et al. Influence of water uptake on the mechanical properties of jute fiber‐reinforced polypropylene. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1994;54:1803-1807.
  29. Sanadi AR, Caulfield DF, et al. Renewable agricultural fibers as reinforcing fillers in plastics: mechanical properties of kenaf fiber-polypropylene composites. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 1995;34:1889-1896.
  30. Bisanda E, Ansell MP. The effect of silane treatment on the mechanical and physical properties of sisal-epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology. 1991;41:165-178.
  31. Mwaikambo LY, Martuscelli E, et al. Kapok/cotton fabric–polypropylene composites. Polymer Testing. 2000;19:905-918.
  32. Jiang L, Hinrichsen G. Flax and cotton fiber reinforced biodegradable polyester amide composites, 2. Characterization of biodegradation. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie. 1999;268:18-21.
  33. Danjaji I, Nawang R, et al. Degradation studies and moisture uptake of sago-starch-filled linear low-density polyethylene composites. Polymer Testing. 2002;21:75-81.
  34. Yang H-S, Kim H-J, et al. Water absorption behavior and mechanical properties of lignocellulosic filler–polyolefin bio-composites. Composite Structures. 2006;72:429-437.