International Journal of Environmental Chemistry

Electronic Waste Vs Environmental Sustainability: Global Ultimatum to Society

  1. Dr. Swapnila Roy ✉
  2. Priyanka Gaur

Abstract

We often suppose that the risks of electronic waste solely have an effect on us which come back directlywith it and are in the main a consequence of inappropriate handling. Obviously, this can be right andthere are many studies that proof the risks ensuing from direct contact with harmful materialscomparable to lead, metal or chromium. The studies together alert us concerning however differentelements, let's say brominated flame retardants generate toxic fumes etc..like such as mercury, zinc,nickel accumulate within the soil, reaches to streams or oceans and eventually, end up being a localeof organic phenomenon, moving to a wider area. Therefore, not only the health of these who innatedirect contact with electronic waste but it have an effect and chances to extend to other people also.Certainly, the possibility will increase for the entire population due to uncontrolled waste, illicittransportation of discarded electronics, activity and handling electronic elements while not acceptablesecurity. However it’s cooperatively true that the toxicity of the weather is specified, they also affectcontradictorily (although they're less significant) to the health of staff in regulated exercise plants.Moreover, youths are particularly liable to the health risks which is able to result from e-waste exposureand, therefore, need a lot of distinct protection. The image from developing countries taking part in oroperating in electronic dumps is sadly turning into acquainted to us. The chemical absorption of unsafesubstances in children is larger than in adults. Might be as a result of their bodies’ useful systems, justlike the central nervous, reproductive, immune and organic process systems are still developing, so theexposure to harmful substances may cause irrevocable damages.Keywords: Electronic Waste; Recycling; Disposal; Transportation;3R’s;Environmental Sustainability

References (18)

  1. Baldé CP, Wang F, Kuehr R, et al. and J. The Global E-Waste Monitor: Quantities, Flows and Resources [Online]. Available from https://i.unu.edu/media/unu.edu/news/52624/UNU-1stGlobal-EWaste-Monitor-2014-small.pdf. (accessed on: July 2, 2016).
  2. Bandyopadhyay A. Indian Initiatives on E-Waste Management-A Critical Review. Environmental Engineering Science. 2008; 25(10): 1507-1526.
  3. Basiago AD. Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist. 1998; 19(2): 145-161.
  4. Manomaivibool P. Extended producer responsibility in a non-OECD context: The management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2009; 53(3): 136-144.
  5. Manomaivibool P, Sujitra V. Extended producer responsibility in Thailand. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2011; 15(2): 185-205.
  6. Andersen MS. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science. 2007; 2(1): 133-140.
  7. Alonso E, Andrew MS, Timothy JW, et al. Evaluating rare earth element availability: A case with revolutionary demand from clean technologies. Environmental Science and Technology. 2012; 46(6): 3406-3414.
  8. Ayres RU. “Industrial metabolism” in Technology and Environment. Washington, DC. National Academy Press; 1989.
  9. Mayers CK, Chris MF, Sarah JC. Extended producer responsibility for waste electronics: An example of printer recycling in the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2005; 9(3): 169-189.
  10. Salzmann O, Aileen IS, Ulrich S. The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European Management Journal. 2005; 23(1): 27-36.
  11. Sharma S, Irene H. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal. 2005; 26(2): 159-180.
  12. Smith Peter AC, Carol S. The shift needed for sustainability. The Learning Organization. 2011; 18(1): 73-86.
  13. United Nations World Population Prospects [Online]. (2015). Available from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/. (accessed on: June 30, 2016).
  14. Widmer, Rolf, Heidi Oswald-Krapf, Deepali Sinha-Khetriwal, Max Schnellmann, and Heinz Böni (2005), "Global perspectives on e-waste", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 436-458.
  15. Zoeteman Bastiaan CJ, Harold RK, Jan V. Handling WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2010; 47(5-8): 415-436.
  16. Hart S. Capitalism at the Crossroads: Aligning Business, Earth, and Humanity. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2007.
  17. Orsato R. Competitive Environmental Strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review. 2006; 48 (2): 127: 143.
  18. Ottman JA, Stafford ER, Hartman CL. Avoiding green marketing myopia: ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2006; 48(5): 22-36.

Read more of it

Subscribe to one journal or build your own list of several. One invoice, one payment, access for a full year.

Subscribe to journals →

Publish your article

Peer-reviewed journals across every subject, with open access options. Send your manuscript to the right editor today.

Publish with us → Calculate your APC
Support