Advances in Reproductive Biotechnology: Innovations in Artificial Insemination and IVF Techniques

Volume: 10 | Issue: 02 | Year 2024 |
International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications
Received Date: 11/26/2024
Acceptance Date: 12/05/2024
Published On: 2024-12-07
First Page: 11
Last Page: 15

Journal Menu

By: Jugal Jaiswal

Student, B. Tech in Biotechnology, IILM University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Reproductive biotechnology has transformed infertility management and animal breeding, with artificial insemination (AI) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) playing pivotal roles. Historically, these technologies have evolved from experimental concepts to essential tools in reproductive medicine and agriculture. AI, introduced in the early 20th century, became instrumental in optimizing breeding programs by allowing selective fertilization without physical mating, thus improving genetic diversity and disease control in livestock. Meanwhile, IVF, developed in the 1970s, marked a milestone in human reproductive health by enabling conception outside the body, providing hope to countless infertile couples. Recent advancements have enhanced these technologies significantly. Precision techniques now allow for more accurate manipulation of gametes and embryos, improving success rates. Cryopreservation has enabled long-term storage of gametes and embryos, facilitating future use and global genetic exchange. Preimplantation genetic testing has emerged as a critical tool for screening embryos for genetic abnormalities, ensuring healthier outcomes. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI)-[CE1] assisted embryo selection utilizes machine learning to identify embryos with the highest implantation potential, increasing efficiency and success rates. These innovations extend beyond human fertility treatments into animal reproduction, supporting genetic improvement programs and conservation efforts for endangered species. Ethical considerations, however, remain crucial. Issues surrounding genetic manipulation, access to technology, and animal welfare require careful evaluation to ensure responsible use. Looking ahead, the integration of advanced biotechnologies promises further breakthroughs, with potential developments in gene editing and personalized reproductive medicine. Balancing innovation with ethical responsibility will be key to shaping the future of reproductive biotechnology in both human and animal domains.


Keywords: Artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, animal reproduction, genetic manipulation, preimplantation genetic testing

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Jugal Jaiswal, Advances in Reproductive Biotechnology: Innovations in Artificial Insemination and IVF Techniques. International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications. 2024; 10(02): 11-15p.

How to cite this URL: Jugal Jaiswal, Advances in Reproductive Biotechnology: Innovations in Artificial Insemination and IVF Techniques. International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications. 2024; 10(02): 11-15p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijaba-v-10-i-02-2024/article=12763

Refrences:

1. Bohrer RC, da Silva CB, Rodrigues LF. Applications of genomic technologies in assisted reproduction: Progress and challenges. Theriogenology. 2019;132:1–10.
2. Bollendorf A, Modry D, Stejskal K. Assisted reproduction in critically endangered northern white rhinos: A conservation case study. Anim Conserv. 2021;24(2):218–225.
3. Brison DR, Houghton FD, Leese HJ. Metabolomics in the assessment of embryo viability in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(5):667–676.
4. FAO. The role of reproductive biotechnology in sustainable livestock production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2021.
5. Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, Turini P, Ponderato N, Colleoni S, et al. Bovine embryo technologies. Theriogenology. 2003;59(2):599–616. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01243-8.
6. Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Malmsten JE, Toschi M, Zisimopoulos P, et al. Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y.
7. Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, et al. Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: A retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril.  2012;98(6):1481–9.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016.
8. Pangestu M, Sudibyo H, Widyarini, S. Optimization of vitrification protocols for human oocyte preservation. J Reprod Biotechnol. 2020;15(4):78–86.
9. Ponsart C, Gagne D, Le Bourhis D. Cryopreservation of bovine embryos: Applications, results, and challenges. Anim Reprod Sci. 2013;136(3):183–190.
10. Shen X, Fu X, Sun Y. The impact of microfluidics on sperm sorting and embryo selection in IVF. Lab on a Chip. 2021;21(15):2867–2879.
11. Squires EL. Strategies for artificial insemination in equine reproduction: Techniques and outcomes. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2010;26(2):409–418.
12. Swain JE. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in IVF? Human Reprod Update. 2012;18(3):333–339. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr053.
13. Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305(5936):707–709. doi: 10.1038/305707a0.