Journal Menu
By: Vishesh Singh Rajput, Shivam Jatav, Rashmi Singh, and Tanuj Kumar.
1- Student, department of Information Technology, Bansal Institute of Sceince and Technology,(RGPV Affliated)Bhopal,India
2- Student, Department of Information Technology, Bansal Institute of Sceince and Technology (RGPV Affliated)Bhopal,India
3- Professor, department of Information Technology, Bansal Institute of Sceince and Technology(RGPV Affliated)Bhopal,India
4- Student, department of Information Technology, Bansal Institute of Sceince and Technology (RGPV Affliated)Bhopal,India
By promoting student involvement, increasing administrative effectiveness, and developing intelligent learning environments, the Internet of Things (IoT) is revolutionizing the education industry. Smart classrooms, interactive whiteboards, and real-time attendance systems are just a few examples of IoT-powered gadgets that are enhancing accessibility and customization in education. The potential impact that IOT can have on various industries is huge, including the education industry. IoT (internet of things) can be said as a network of interconnected devices that collect and exchange data over internet, it can be used to improve administration of staff and students, efficiency in learning and engaging education environment. The uses, advantages, and dangers of IoT in education are thoroughly examined in this paper. It examines the ways in which IoT is transforming conventional teaching strategies while simultaneously tackling the associated difficulties. Teachers and legislators may successfully deploy IoT solutions and guarantee a safe, inclusive, and effective educational system by being aware of the opportunities as well as the threats.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Internet of Things (IoT), Education, Blockchain.
Citation:
Refrences:
1. Uskov VL, Bakken JP, Pandey A. The ontology of next generation smart classrooms. In Smart education and smart e-learning. Springer International Publishing. 2015. pp. 3–14.
2. Witchel HJ, Santos CP, Ackah JK, Westling CE, Chockalingam N. Non-instrumental movement inhibition (NIMI) differentially suppresses head and thigh movements during screenic engagement: Dependence on interaction. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:157.
3. Japkowicz N, Shah M. Evaluating learning algorithms: A classification perspective. Cambridge University Press; 2011 Jan 17.
4. Littman ML, Moore AW. Reinforcement learning: A survey. J Artif Intell Res.
5. Kotsiantis S, Pierrakeas C, Pintelas P. Predicting students’ performance in distance learning using machine learning techniques. Appl Artif Intell. 2004 May 1;18(5):411–26.
6. Howard, SK, Mozejko, A. Teachers: Technology, change, and resistance. Australian Educational
Computing. 2015:30(2). Retrieved from Frontiers in Education.
7. Shin J, Gierl MJ. A technology-enhanced approach for locating timely and relevant news articles for context-based science education. In artificial intelligence in stem education. CRC Press. 2022 Dec 29. pp. 109–126.
8. Abe R, Suzuki S, Nakamura O. A conceptual model for claim validation based on cryptographically
signed data. IEEE Access. 2024 Dec 31.
9. Steiu MF. Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, and challenges. First Monday.2020 Aug 24.
10. Sharples M, Domingue J. The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record,
reputation and reward. In Adaptive and Adaptable Learning: 11th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2016, Lyon, France, September 13–16, 2016, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing. 11 2016. pp. 490–496.
11. Kosmatos EA, Tselikas ND, Boucouvalas AC. Integrating RFIDs and smart objects into a Unified Internet of Things architecture. Advances in Internet of Things. 2011 Apr 21;1(1):5–12.
12. Ghavifekr S, Rosdy WA. Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. Int J Sci Educ. 2015;1(2):175–91.
13. Malik RH, Rizvi AA. Effect of Classroom Learning Environment on Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics at Secondary Level. Bull Educ Res. 2018 Aug;40(2):207–18.
14. Perez J, Montano J, Perez J. Does temperature impact student performance? Room temperature and its impact on student test scores. Association for Learning Environments. 2014.
15. Petrov I. Entropy and hierarchy of competition in the World semiconductor market during COVID19 pandemics. In 2021 International Conference Automatics and Informatics (ICAI). IEEE. 2021 Sep 30. pp. 389–392.
16. Pocero L, Amaxilatis D, Mylonas G, Chatzigiannakis I. Open source IoT meter devices for smart and energy-efficient school buildings. Hardware X. 2017 Apr 1;1:54–67.
17. Yakubu MN, Abubakar AM. Applying machine learning approach to predict students’ performance in higher educational institutions. Kybernetes. 2022 Feb 7;51(2):916–34.
18. Kim BH, Vizitei E, Ganapathi V. GritNet: Student performance prediction with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07405. 2018 Apr 19.
19. Gräther W, Kolvenbach S, Ruland R, Schütte J, Torres C, Wendland F. Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. In Proceedings of 1st ERCIM Blockchain workshop 2018. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). 2018.
20. Li J, Sun Q, Sun F. Enhancing privacy-preserving intrusion detection in blockchain-based networks with deep learning. Data Sci J. 2023 Aug 31;22(1).
21. Alammary A, Alhazmi S, Almasri M, Gillani S. Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Appl Sci. 2019 Jun 13;9(12):2400.
22. Affia AA, Nolte A, Matulevičius R. IoT security risk management: A framework and teaching approach. Inform Educ. 2023 Dec 15;22(4):555–88.
23. Andrade R, Ortiz-Garcés I, Tintin X, Llumiquinga G. Factors of risk analysis for IoT systems. Risks. 2022 Aug 10;10(8):162.
24. Aldowah H, Rehman SU, Ghazal S, Umar IN. Internet of Things in higher education: A study on
future learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. 2017 Sep 1;892(1):012017.