This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
Journal Menu
By: Rushikesh P. Deshmukh and R. S. Londhe
ABSTRACT – This research investigates the seismic performance of a 15-storey reinforced concrete building with varying shear wall configurations, focusing on the effects of vertical and staggered openings. The study compares three models: one with solid shear walls, one with vertical openings, and one with staggered openings. Using ETABS V21 software and performing the analysis in Seismic Zone IV under the Response Spectrum Method (IS 1893:2016), the results show that solid shear walls offer the best seismic performance, with minimal displacement, drift, and shear. The models with openings exhibited higher displacements and reduced stiffness, with staggered openings performing slightly better than solid shear wall (without opening). This research highlights the importance of optimized shear wall designs to enhance the seismic resilience of multi-storey buildings.
The results of the analysis indicate that the model with solid shear walls demonstrates superior seismic performance, exhibiting the lowest values of displacement, drift, and base shear. This confirms the effectiveness of uninterrupted shear walls in enhancing the overall stability and stiffness of multi-storey buildings during seismic events. In contrast, the models incorporating openings—both vertical and staggered—showed increased displacements and reduced stiffness, highlighting the detrimental effects of discontinuities in the shear wall system. Interestingly, among the two types of openings, the model with staggered openings performed marginally better than the one with vertical openings, suggesting that the distribution and arrangement of openings can influence the seismic response. This research underscores the critical importance of optimizing shear wall design, particularly when openings are unavoidable due to architectural or service requirements. By carefully considering the size, location, and pattern of openings, engineers can mitigate adverse effects and enhance the seismic resilience of multi-storey RC buildings. The findings provide valuable insights for structural designers aiming to balance functional needs with safety and performance in earthquake-prone regions.
![]()
Citation:
Refrences:
- Aarthi Harini, G. Senthil Kumar, “Behavior of reinforced concrete shear wall with staggered openings under seismic loads” Journal for Research in Emerging Science and Technology, Volume 2 (2015), pp. 91-96.
- Abdul K. Marsonoand and Somaieh Hatami, “Analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls with single band of octagonal openings” Springer, Volume 8 (2015), pp. 205-215.
- Arvind R. Patel, Dr. K. B. Parikh, “Effect on location of shear wall opening in reinforced concrete irregular structure subjected to seismic load and blast load” International Journal of Innovative Research, Volume 2 (2015), pp. 2011-2018.
- Bing Lia, Kai Qianb, Hui Wua, “Flange effects on seismic performance of reinforced concrete squat walls with irregular or regular openings” Elsevier, Volume 110 (2016), pp. 127-144.
- Bush R.C., Sruthi J.S., and Ajay Kumar, “Study of seismic analysis of asymmetric building with different shapes of staggered openings and without openings in shear wall” Volume 64 (2022), Elsevier, pp. 964-969.
- Danial Dan, Sorin-Codrut Florut, Viorel Todea, “Theoretical study on steel reinforced concrete hybrid walls with centered and staggered openings” Key Engineering Materials, Volume 763 (2018), pp. 812-817.
- Ehsan Montazeri, N. Panahshahi and Brad Cross, “Nonlinear finite element analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls with staggered openings under seismic loads” American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE), Volume 26, (2018), pp. 281-291.
- D. Pawar, and V.B. Dawari, “Effect of openings in shear wall on seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings” Alwaha Scientific Publishing Services (ASPS), Volume 12, (2022), pp. 725-730.
- Muthukumar and Manoj Kumar, “Influence of openings on the structural response of shear wall” Springer, Volume 10 (2015), pp. 978-981.
- S. Kim, D.G. Lee, “Analysis of shear wall with openings using super elements” Elsevier, Volume 25, (2003), pp. 981-991.
- Manoj Kumar, V. Keshav, “Effect of shape and size of openings in shear walls on lateral deformations in shear walled framed structures” Alwaha Scientific Publishing Services (ASPS), Volume 12 (2022), pp. 901-907.
- Marius Mosoarca, “Failure analysis of reinforced concrete shear walls with staggered openings under seismic loads” Elsevier, Volume 5 (2013), pp. 308-319.
- Marius M., “Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete shear walls with regular and staggered openings after the strong earthquakes between 2009 and 2011” Elsevier, Volume 5 (2013) pp. 350-358.
- Husain, A.S. Eisa and M. Hegazy, “Strengthening of reinforced concrete shear walls with openings using carbon fibre-reinforced polymers” Advanced Structural Engineering, Volume 6 (2019), pp. 206-2016.
- Minghao Li, Borjen Yeh, Frank Lam, “Modelling force transfer around openings in wood-frame shear walls” American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE), Volume 138, (2012), pp. 1419-1426.

