V. Basil Hans | International Journal of Distributed Computing and Technology | Vol 11, Issue 02 | pp. 13-20 | ISSN: 2455-7307
Abstract
One of the most promising uses of blockchain technology in financial markets is to modernize securities settlement procedures. Centralized intermediaries, like clearing houses and custodians often cause delays, operational inefficiencies, and counterparty risk in traditional settlement systems. Blockchain, or distributed ledger technology (DLT), can completely change this infrastructure by making real-time, peer-to-peer settlement possible, increasing transparency, and making recordkeeping unchangeable. This article looks at the legal, regulatory, and operational effects of using blockchain in securities settlement. It looks at how DLT-based models go against current legal ideas of “finality,” “ownership,” and “control” under U.S. securities law and international rules, like the EU’s Central Securities Depositories Regulation. The article also looks at current pilot programs, such as the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’s Project Ion and the European Central Bank’s DLT projects. It looks at both their technological potential and the regulatory problems they face. The essay contends that blockchain can enhance settlement efficiency and mitigate systemic risk; nevertheless, it simultaneously introduces intricate issues related to jurisdiction, data governance, and responsibility within decentralized networks. The report ends by suggesting a hybrid regulatory structure that strikes a compromise between protecting investors and promoting innovation, which will lead to a safe and efficient future for blockchain-based settlements.
Blockchain technology, securities settlement, distributed ledger (DLT), financial regulation, market infrastructure
🔒 This is a subscription article
Full text is available to subscribers and institutional members. Please choose an option below to access it.
SubscribePurchase this articleInstitutional / Login accessReferences
- Geis GS. Traceable shares and corporate law. Nw UL Rev. 2018;113(2):227.
- Davidson S, De Filippi P, Potts J. Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. J Inst Econ. 2018;14(4):639–658. doi: 10.1017/S1744137417000200.
- Wu H, Yao Q, Liu Z, Huang B, Zhuang Y, Tang H, et al. Blockchain for finance: A survey. IET Blockchain. 2024;4(2):101–123. doi: 10.1049/blc2.12067.
- Gilda S, Jain T, Dhalla A. None Shall Pass: A blockchain-based federated identity management system. In: Inventive Computation and Information Technologies: Proceedings of ICICIT 2022. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. pp. 329–352. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7402-1_24.
- Bhattacharya A. Blockchain‐based identity management. In: Blockchain for Business: How it Works and Creates Value. 2021. pp. 141–158. doi: 10.1002/9781119711063.ch7.
- Kang I, Gupta A, Seneviratne O. Blockchain interoperability landscape. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Big Data (Big Data). 2022. pp. 3191–3200. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09227.
- Avrilionis D, Hardjono T. Towards blockchain-enabled open architectures for scalable digital asset platforms. arXiv Prepr arXiv:2110.12553. 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2110.12553.
- Zakhary V, Amiri MJ, Maiyya S, Agrawal D, Abbadi AE. Towards global asset management in blockchain systems. arXiv Prepr arXiv:1905.09359. 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1905.09359.
- Wakeman I, Ellis D, Owen T, Rathke J, Watson D. Risky business: Motivations for markets in programmable networks. In: IFIP Int Work Conf Active Netw. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2003. pp. 266–279. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24715-9_23.
- Lohmer J, Bugert N, Lasch R. Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study. Int J Prod Econ. 2020;228:107882. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882.
- Cong LW, He Z. Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. Rev Financ Stud. 2019;32(5):1754–1797.
- Magnier V, Barban P. The potential impact of blockchains on corporate governance: A survey on shareholders’ rights in the digital era. InterEULawEast J Int Eur Law Econ Mark Integr. 2018;5(2):189–226. doi: 10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.7.
- Reyes CL. Conceptualizing cryptolaw. Neb L Rev. 2017;96(2):384.
- Becker K. Blockchain matters—Lex cryptographia and the displacement of legal symbolics and imaginaries. Law Crit. 2022;33(2):113–130. doi: 10.1007/s10978-021-09317-8.
- Markey‐Towler B. Anarchy, blockchain and utopia: A theory of political-socioeconomic systems organised using blockchain. SSRN Electron J. 2018;1(1):1–14. doi: 10.31585/jbba-1-1-(1)2018.
- Hughes L, Dwivedi YK, Misra SK, Rana NP, Raghavan V, Akella V, et al. Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;49:114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.005.
How to cite this article
@article{HansVB2025,
author = {V. Basil Hans},
title = {Blockchain as the Bard of Securities Settlement: A New Way to Think About Trust, Speed, and Openness},
journal = {International Journal of Distributed Computing and Technology},
year = {2025},
volume = {11},
number = {02},
pages = {13--20},
issn = {2455-7307},
url = {https://journalspub.com/publication/ijdct/article=22134}
}