Application of Jaya and PSO Algorithms for Optimal Sizing of Renewable Energy Sources in Power Systems

Volume: 10 | Issue: 02 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology
Received Date: 10/15/2024
Acceptance Date: 10/18/2024
Published On: 2024-10-31
First Page: 19
Last Page: 32

Journal Menu

By: Raghvendra Verma, Bindeshwar Singh, Deependra Singh, and K. S. Verma

1-Student, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh 228118, India.
2-Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh 228118, India.
3-Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh 228118, India.
4-Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh 228118, India.

Abstract

The deregulation and privatization of the electrical sectors in recent years have caused the distribution systems to run closer to their load capacity limit. Due to the increased power loss resulting from this, the distribution system now operates at a higher voltage than the current transmission networks. For electric power system networks to be more reliable, efficient, and cost-effective, distributed generation must be positioned and sized optimally. Allocation helps minimize active power losses and improve the voltage profile, ensuring the secure operation of the power system. Distribution network operators must meet both the quantitative and qualitative power demands of consumers while adhering to these operational requirements. In this study, the JAYA, PSO, and RAO algorithms are used to determine the optimal distributed generation placement. Various DG types, including Type-1, Type-2, Type-3, and Type-4, are considered for the IEEE-9 bus system to achieve significant power loss reduction. The JAYA, PSO, and RAO algorithms are implemented using MATLAB Toolbox and Mat-Power 7.0 to identify optimal distributed generation allocation under the most probable scenarios. Although all optimization techniques yield similar results, the RAO algorithm demonstrates faster performance compared to the others.

Keywords: Distributed Generation (DG), IEEE-9 bus, optimal size of DG, Jaya algorithm, bus voltage, power loss

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Raghvendra Verma, Bindeshwar Singh, Deependra Singh, and K. S. Verma, Application of Jaya and PSO Algorithms for Optimal Sizing of Renewable Energy Sources in Power Systems. International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology. 2024; 10(02): 19-32p.

How to cite this URL: Raghvendra Verma, Bindeshwar Singh, Deependra Singh, and K. S. Verma, Application of Jaya and PSO Algorithms for Optimal Sizing of Renewable Energy Sources in Power Systems. International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology. 2024; 10(02): 19-32p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijepst/article=13721
Full Text

Refrences:

  1. Farsangi MM, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Lee KY, Multi-objective VAr Planning with SVC for a Large Power System Using PSO and GA. In: 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2006. pp. 274–9.
  2. Ko CN, Chang YP, Wu CJ. A PSO method with nonlinear time-varying evolution for optimal design of harmonic filters. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2008;24(1):437–44.
  3. Auchariyamet S, Sirisumrannukul S. Optimal Reactive Power Planning with Facts Devices by Particle Swarm Technique. King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand.
  4. Sundareswaran K, Hariharan B, Parasseri FP, Antony DS, Subair B. Optimal placement of Static VAr Compensators (SVC’s) using Particle Swarm Optimization. In: 2010 International Conference on Power, Control and Embedded Systems, Allahabad, India. 2010. pp. 1–4.
  5. Benabid R, Boudour M, Abido MA. Optimal placement of FACTS devices for multi-objective voltage stability problem. In: 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA. 2009. pp. 1–11.
  6. Sakthivel S, Mary D, Vetrivel R, Kannan VS. Optimal location of SVC for voltage stability enhancement under contingency condition through PSO algorithm. Int J Comp Appl. 2011;20(1):30–6.
  7. Das TK, Jetti SR, Venayagamoorthy GK. Optimal Design of SVC Damping Controllers with Wide Area Measurements Using Small Population based PSO. In: 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2006. pp. 2255–60.
  8. Dhananjaya Babu, M. Damodar Reddy .
  9. Singh, Verma KS, Pooja Mishra, “FACTS Controllers Power System (PS); Performance Parameters of Systems” Department of Electrical Engineering, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur. 228118 (U.P.)
  10. Eghbal M, Yorino N, Zoka Y. Comparative study on the application of modern heuristic techniques to SVC placement problem. J Comput. 2009;4(6):535–41.
  11. Farsangi MM, Nezamabadi-pour H, Lee KY. Multi-objective VAr planning with SVC using immune algorithm and guaranteed convergence particle swarm optimization. IFAC Proc Vol. 2008;41(2):5599–604.
  12. Singh, K. S. Verma, K. K. Singh, Anuj Kumar Shukla, Anurag Singh, Jayant Vishnu Narlikar. “Clearance of Fault in Power System Networks by SVC and Statcom” Dept. of EE KNIT, Sultanpur-228118 (U.P.), India July 6–11, 2008.
  13. Singh B, Verma KS, Singh D, Singh CN, Singh A, Agarwal E, et al. Introduction to FACTS controllers a critical review. Int J Rev Comp. 2011;8(31):17–34.
  14. Yoshida H, Kawata K, Fukuyama Y. A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2006;15(4):1232–9.
  15. Farsangi MM, Nezamabadi-pour H, Lee KY. Implementation of GCPSO for Multi-objective VAr Planning with SVC and Its Comparison with GA and PSO. In: 2007 International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2007. pp. 1–6.
  16. Nagalakshmi S, Kamaraj N. Loadability enhancement for pool model with FACTS devices in transmission system using Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization. In: India International Conference on Power Electronics 2010 (IICPE2010), New Delhi, India. 2011. pp. 1–8.
  17. Jain VK, Singh H, Srivastava L. Minimization of reactive power using particle swarm optimization. Int J Comp Eng Res. 2012;2:686–91.
  18. Banga A, Kaushik SS. Modeling and simulation of SVC controller for enhancement of power system stability. Int J Adv Eng Tech. 2011;1(3):79.
  19. Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L. Understanding FACTS. New York: IEEE Press; 2000.

 Previous Article
Next Article