Thermodynamic Analysis of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector based Water Heating System: Experimental Approach

Volume: 11 | Issue: 01 | Year 2025 | Subscription
International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology
Received Date: 02/03/2025
Acceptance Date: 02/07/2025
Published On: 2025-02-18
First Page:
Last Page:

Journal Menu


By: Azharuddin, Prashant Saini, Abhinav Yadav, Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, and Piyush Tiwari

1.Azharuddin,Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273010, India
2.Prashant Saini*,Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273010, India
3.Abhinav Yadav,Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273010, India
4.Vijay Kumar Dwivedi,Professor and Chairman, Training and Placement Cell, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273010, India
5.Piyush Tiwari,Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273010, India

Abstract

Energy from the sun is the most profuse and least extracted source of energy ever used in the history of usable resources. Current work aims to harness solar energy for heating water and put it into use by maximizing its effect through evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC). In this work, the effect of low mass flow rates on thermodynamic performance (energy efficiency, exergy efficiency and rate of irreversibility) of an ETSC is investigated at Gorakhpur, India experimentally. The energy efficiency and exergy efficiency represent the quantitative and qualitative performances of the proposed system. To calculate system performance, conditions were taken with the variation in mass flow rates (5×10^(-4) kg/s, 7×10^(-4) kg/s, and 9×10^(-4) kg/s) for three consecutive days. Results reveals that, maximum solar intensity and ambient temperature have been recorded as 810 W/m2 and 37 ℃ respectively. Maximum value of ETSC inlet and outlet temperatures recorded as 43 ℃ and 97 ℃ respectively. Maximum ETSC energy efficiency and exergy efficiency have been obtained as 43.46% and 45.39% respectively. Evacuated tubes provided an edge on energy conservation as it does not require direct sunlight on collector surface due to its shape which resulted in minimal loss of energy and increase in thermal efficiencies. Such a system is recommended for their further integration with various energy generation systems to produce the energy effects.

Keywords: Solar energy· Evacuated tube collector· Water heating system· Thermodynamic analysis· Rate of Irreversibility.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Azharuddin, Prashant Saini, Abhinav Yadav, Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, and Piyush Tiwari, Thermodynamic Analysis of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector based Water Heating System: Experimental Approach. International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology. 2025; 11(01): -p.

How to cite this URL: Azharuddin, Prashant Saini, Abhinav Yadav, Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, and Piyush Tiwari, Thermodynamic Analysis of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector based Water Heating System: Experimental Approach. International Journal of Electrical Power System and Technology. 2025; 11(01): -p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijepst/article=15283

Refrences:

  1. Kannan N, Vakeesan D. Solar energy for future world- a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016; 62: 1092-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022
  2. Sabiha MA, Saidur R, Mekhilef S, Mahian O. Progress and latest developments of evacuated tube solar collectors. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2015; 51: 1038-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.016
  3. Park SR, Pandey AK, Tyagi VV, Tyagi SK. Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014; 30(7): 105-123. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.011
  4. Budihardjo I, Morrison GL. Performance of water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters. Sol Energy 2009; 83: 49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2008.06.010
  5. Tang R, Yang Y, Gao W. Comparative studies on thermal performance of water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters with different collector tilt-angles. Sol Energy 2011; 85(7): 1381-1389. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2011.03.019
  6. Ma L, Lu Z, Zhang J, Liang R .Thermal performance analysis of the glass evacuated tube solar collector with U-tube. Build Environ 2010; 45(9): 1959-1967. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.015
  7. Ersoz MA. Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe. Renew Energy 2016; 96: 244-256. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058
  8. Kalogirou SA, Karellas S, Braimakis K, Stanciu C, Badescu V. Exergy analysis of solar thermal collectors and processes. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2016; 56: 106-137. doi:1016/j.pecs.2016.05.002
  9. Jafarkazemi F, Ahmadifard E, Abdi H. Energy and exergy efficiency of heat pipe evacuated tube solar collectors. Therm Sci 2016; 20(1): 327-335. doi:10.2298/tsci130227150j
  10. Saxena G, Gaur MK. Exergy analysis of evacuated tube solar collectors: a review. Int J Exergy 2018; 25(1): 54-74. Doi:1504/IJEX.2018.088887
  11. Kacan E, Ulgen K. Energy and exergy analysis of solar combisystems. Int J Exergy 2014; 14(3): 364–387. doi:10.1504/IJEX.2014.061034
  12. Hasan Y, Mecit S. Exergy analysis of a vacuum tube solar collector system having indirect working principle. Therm Sci 2017; 21(6 Part B):2813-2825. doi:10.2298/TSCI150905009Y
  13. Acar C, Dincer I. Exergetic performance assessment of an integrated solar energy system. Int J Exergy 2016; 19(2):161–172. doi:1504/IJEX.2016.075603
  14. Daghigh R, Shafieian A. Theoretical and experimental analysis of thermal performance of a solar water heating system with evacuated tube heat pipe collector. Appl Therm Eng 2016; 103: 1219-1227. doi:1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.034
  15. Gao Y, Zhang Q, Fan R, Lin X, Yu Y. Effects of thermal mass and flow rate on forced-circulation solar hot-water system: Comparison of water-in-glass and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collectors. Sol Energy 2013; 98: 290-301. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.014
  16. Mishra RK, Garg V, Tiwari GN. Thermal modeling and development of characteristic equations of evacuated tubular collector (ETC). Sol Energy 2015; 116: 165-176. doi:1016/j.solener.2015.04.003
  17. Papadimitratos A, Sobhansarbandi S, Pozdin V, Zakhidov A, Hassanipour F. Evacuated tube solar collectors integrated with phase change materials. Sol Energy 2016; 129: 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.040
  18. Saidur R, Boroumand JG, Mekhlif S, Jameel M. Exergy analysis of solar energy applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2012; 16(1):350-356. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.162
  19. Sarkar J. Performance of a flat-plate solar thermal collector using supercritical carbon dioxide as heat transfer fluid. Int J Sustain Energy 2013; 32(6): 531-543. doi:1080/14786451.2013.833205
  20. Eltaweel M, Abdel-Rehima AA, Attiab AAA. A comparison between flat-plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in terms of energy and exergy analysis by using nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 2021; 186: 116516. doi:1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116516
  21. Chai S, Yao J, Liang J, Chiang YC, Zhao Y, Chen SL, Dai Y. Heat transfer analysis and thermal performance investigation on an evacuated tube solar collector with inner concentrating by reflective coating. Sol Energy 2021; 220: 175–186. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.048
  22. Murugan M, Saravanan A, Elumalai PV, Kumar P, Saleel CA, Samuel OD, Setiyo M, Enweremadu CC, Afzal A. An overview on energy and exergy analysis of solar thermal collectors with passive performance enhancers. Alex Eng J 2022; 61: 8123-8147. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.052
  23. Mangal D, Lamba DK, Gupta T, Jhamb K. Acknowledgement of evacuated tube solar water heater over flat plate solar water heater. Int J Eng 2010; 4(4): 279-284.
  24. Saini P, Singh J, Sarkar J. Thermodynamic, economic and environmental analyses of a novel solar energy driven small-scale combined cooling, heating and power system. Energy Convers Manag Rev 2020; 226: 113542. doi:1016/j.enconman.2020.113542
  25. Petela R. Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation. Solar Energy 2003; 74:469-488. doi:10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00226-3
  26. Jafarkazemi F, Ahmadifard E. Energetic and exergetic evaluation of flat plate solar collectors. Renew Energy; Volume 56, August 2013, Pages 55-63
  27. Saini P, Singh J, Sarkar J. Proposal and performance comparison of various solar-driven novel combined cooling, heating and power system topologies. Energy Convers Manag; Volume 205, 1 February 2020, 112342
  28. Rahbar N, Asadi A, Fotouhi BE. Performance evaluation of two solar stills of different geometries: Tubular versus triangular: Experimental study, numerical simulation, and second law analysis. Desalination 2018; Volume 443, 1 October 2018, Pages 44-55.
  29. Sadeghi G, Safarzadeh H, Ameri M. Experimental and numerical investigations on performance of evacuated tube solar collectors with parabolic concentrator, applying synthesized Cu2O/distilled water nanofluid. Energy Sustain Dev; Volume 48, February 2019, Pages 88-106