A Comparative Study of Seasonal Variability and Photocatalytic Impact on Water Quality of the Ayad River, Rajasthan

Volume: 11 | Issue: 02 | Year 2025 | Subscription
International Journal of Green Chemistry
Received Date: 09/04/2025
Acceptance Date: 09/09/2025
Published On: 2025-10-30
First Page: 1
Last Page: 17

Journal Menu

By: Chetan Singh, Dipti Soni, Rehana Khanam, Rohitash Kumar, Bhavya Vyas, and Rajput Vishakha Ranjitisinh.

1Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry, Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry, Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
3Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry, Vidya Bhawan Rural Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
4Assistant Professor, Department of Physics, Madhav University, Pindwara, Sirohi, Rajasthan, India
5Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry, Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
6Research Scholar, Department of Chemistry, Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

This study examines seasonal fluctuation in Ayad River water quality, Rajasthan, India and compares the performance of titanium dioxide (TiO2)-mediated photocatalytic treatment under natural sunlight irradiance. Ayad River is a critical source of freshwater for domestic, agricultural and environmental purposes, which is increasingly stressed by urban runoff, industrial effluent and seasonality. As a follow-up to the above, water samples of four important water sources- Thurmadar, Subhas Nagar Bridge (Ayad), Kanpur Mahadev and SukhaNala were taken in summer season and treated with TiO2 as a photocatalyst under natural sunlight. General physicochemical parameters, such as pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)[CE1] , chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS), and ions, such as Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, NO2⁻, Cl⁻, and SO4²⁻, were analyzed following standard procedure (IS:3025). Comparison study of pre- and post-treatment investigations showed enhanced quality of water at both places. Particularly, COD concentrations fell by approximately 60–80%, while BOD levels showed a remarkable fall, a proof of effective oxidation of the organic contaminants. Rising DO indicated promise for restoration of the ecosystem. Moreover, decrease in nitrate and fluoride concentration provided safety and potability to the ecosystem. The research proves the effectiveness of TiO2 photocatalysis as a low-cost, mass-transferable and green water treatment technology for the mitigation of river water pollution in urban areas. The findings affirm the viability of integrating green technologies into river systems and provide a scientific basis for applying sustainable water treatment processes in other parts of the developing world with comparable problems.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Chetan Singh, Dipti Soni, Rehana Khanam, Rohitash Kumar, Bhavya Vyas, and Rajput Vishakha Ranjitisinh A Comparative Study of Seasonal Variability and Photocatalytic Impact on Water Quality of the Ayad River, Rajasthan. International Journal of Green Chemistry. 2025; 11(02): 1-17p.

How to cite this URL: Chetan Singh, Dipti Soni, Rehana Khanam, Rohitash Kumar, Bhavya Vyas, and Rajput Vishakha Ranjitisinh, A Comparative Study of Seasonal Variability and Photocatalytic Impact on Water Quality of the Ayad River, Rajasthan. International Journal of Green Chemistry. 2025; 11(02): 1-17p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijgc/article=22814

Refrences:

  1. Asiltürk M, Sayılkan F, Arpaç E. Effect of Fe³⁺ ion doping to TiO₂ on the photocatalytic degradation of malachite green under UV and visible irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2009;203:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.12.021.
  2. Yu J, Xiang Q, Zhou M, Yu H. Preparation, characterization and visible light driven photocatalytic activity of Fe doped titania nanorods. Appl Catal B Environ. 2009;90:595–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.12.021.
  3. Tong T, Zhang J, Tian B, Chen F, He D. Preparation of Fe³⁺ doped TiO₂ catalysts by controlled hydrolysis: Photodegradation of methyl orange. J Hazard Mater. 2008;155(3):572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.106.
  4. Bingham S, Daoud WA. Recent advances in making nano sized TiO₂ visible light active through rare earth metal doping. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:2041–2053. doi: 10.1039/C0JM02271C.
  5. Di Paola A, Lopez EIG, Ikeda S, Mar G, Ohtani B, Palmisano L. Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds by transition metal doped polycrystalline TiO₂. Catal Today. 2002;75(1–4):87–93. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00048-2.
  6. Di Paola A, Marci G, Palmisano L, et al. Impregnation of TiO₂ with various transition metal ions: Photocatalytic activity for 4-nitrophenol degradation. J Phys Chem B. 2002;106(2–3):637–645.
  7. Ganesh I, Kumar PP, Gupta AK, Sekhar PSC, Radha K, Padmanabham G, et al. Preparation and characterization of Fe-doped TiO₂ powders for solar light response and photocatalytic applications. Process Appl Ceram. 2012;6(2):21–36..
  8. Liu L, Zhao H, Andino JM, Li Y. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction with H₂O on TiO₂ nanocrystals: Comparison of polymorphs and exploration of surface chemistry. ACS Catal. 2012;2(8):1817–1828. doi: 10.1021/cs300273q.
  9. Sacco O, Vaiano V, Han C, Sannino D, Dionysiou DD. Photocatalytic removal of atrazine using N-doped TiO₂ supported on phosphors. Appl Catal B Environ. 2015;164:462–474. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.062.
  10. Nasi R, Esposito S, Freyria FS, Armandi M, Gadhi TA, Hernandez S, et al. Application of reverse micelle sol⁻gel synthesis for bulk doping and heteroatoms surface enrichment in mo-doped TiO₂ nanoparticles. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(6):937. doi: 10.3390/ma12060937.
  11. Sacco O, Vaiano V, et al. Photodegradation of acid orange 7 by Fe-N-Co doped TiO₂. Arab J Chem. 2020;13:8347–60. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878535220301738.
  12. Akilan LK, Anuradha T, Soni KB, Alex S, Radhika NK, Atala SA, et al. Department of Farm Machinery & Power Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College & Research Institute, TNAU, Kumulur-621 712, Trichy District, Tamil Nadu. J Appl Hortic. 2025;27(1). Available from: https://tnau.ac.in/site/aecri-kumulur/department-of-fmpe-about-department.
  13. Pareta K, Dashora Y. Climate change projections and hydrological modelling to predict the streamflow in Berach-Banas catchment, Rajasthan. Discov Water. 2025;5(1):15. doi: 1007/s43832-025-00208-y.
  14. Singh KP, Saxena A. Seasonal variations and correlation analysis of water quality parameters in the Chambal River, Rajasthan, India. Water Environ Res. 2025;97(2):e70035. doi: 10.1002/wer.70035.
  15. Kumar M, Mishra GV. Causes and impacts of water pollution on various water bodies in the state of Rajasthan, India: A review. Environ Ecol. 2024;42(2A):64–54. doi: 10.60151/envec/QIYJ5706.
  16. Meena DK, Singh S, Singh SK, Pandey V, Rana RS, Sajan B, et al. Seasonal variations and water quality dynamics: Analysis of Kanota Dam in relation to WHO standards. 2024;11(2):771–786.
  17. Ansari SA, Khan MM, Ansari MO, Cho MH. Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide (N-doped TiO2) for visible light photocatalysis. New J Chem. 2016;40:3000–3009. doi: 1039/C5NJ03478G.
  18. Liu G, Zhao Y, Sun C, Li F, Lu GQ, Cheng H-M. Synergistic effects of B/N doping on visible light photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO₂. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(24):4516–4519. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705633.
  19. Umebayashi T, Yamaki T, Itoh H, Asai K. Band gap narrowing of TiO₂ by sulfur doping. Appl Phys Lett. 2002;81(3):454–456. doi: 10.1063/1.1493647.
  20. Rockafellow EM, Haywood JM, Witte T, Houk RS, Jenks WS. Selenium-modified TiO₂ and its impact on photocatalysis. Langmuir. 2010;26(24):19052–19059. doi: 10.1021/la1026569.
  21. Guo M, Du J. First principles study of electronic structures and optical properties of Cu, Ag, and Au-doped anatase TiO₂. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 2012;407(6):1003–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2011.12.128.
  22. Zhang M, Lu D, Zhang Z, Yang J. Enhancement of visible light photocurrent of V+N co-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays. J Electrochem Soc. 2014;161(6):H416. doi: 10.1149/2.119406jes.
  23. Zhang M, Wu J, Hou J, Yang J. Mo and N co-doped TiO₂ nanotube arrays with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Sci Adv Mater. 2013;5(6):535–541(7). doi: 10.1166/sam.2013.1488.
  24. Sacco O, Vaiano V, et al. N-Fe-Co doped TiO₂ active under cost effective visible light (395 nm). Catalysts. 2020;10:547. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/5/547.
  25. Nasirian M, Lin YP, Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO₂ using non-metal doping methods under visible light: A review. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;15(9):2009–2032. doi: 10.1007/s13762-017-1618-2.

 Previous Article
Next Article

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Powered by