By: Ms. Shalinee Tripathi, Dr. Deepti Pande Rana, and Suparna Sircar
1. Student, Amity School of Architecture and Planning, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, India
2. Associate Professor Amity School of Architecture and Planning, Amity University Uttar, Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, India
3. Professor Amity School of Architecture and Planning, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, India
This report explores the integration of smart home technology in interior design to support independent living for aging adults. As the global population ages, there is a growing need for innovative solutions that allow older adults to age in place safely and comfortably. The study examines key smart home technologies, including AI-driven systems, assistive robotics, voice and gesture control, and healthcare integration, highlighting their potential to enhance safety, accessibility, and quality of life. Findings indicate that smart home technologies can significantly improve the independence of aging adults by offering personalized and user-friendly solutions that adapt to individual needs. However, challenges such as affordability, usability, and privacy concerns remain barriers to widespread adoption. The report also identifies future trends, including advancements in AI, robotics, augmented reality, and telemedicine, which are expected to further transform smart interiors for aging adults. The implications of these technologies extend beyond individual households, with potential impacts on healthcare systems and community support networks. As technology continues to evolve, it will be crucial to address the ethical, financial, and design challenges to ensure that smart home solutions are accessible, effective, and sustainable for the aging population.
Keywords: Smart home technology, independent living, aging in place, user-cantered design, healthcare integration, privacy and security, wearable technology, energy efficiency, sustainability, ethical considerations, usability, quality of life enhancement
Citation:
Refrences:
- Chan, M., Estève, D., Escriba, C., & Campo, E. (2009). A review of smart homes—Present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 91(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.11.004
- Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M. (2008). Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462307080154
- Rantz, M. J., Skubic, M., Abbott, C., Galambos, C., Pak, Y., Ho, D. K., & Keller, J. (2015). Automated in-home fall risk assessment and detection sensor system for elders. The Gerontologist, 55 (Suppl_1), S78-S87. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv044
- Rashidi, P., & Mihailidis, A. (2013). A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(3), 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2012.2234129
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
- Wang, J., Carroll, D., Peck, M., & Myneni, S. (2017). Mobile and wearable technology needs for aging in place: Perspectives from older adults and their caregivers and providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e93. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7127
- Liu, L., Stroulia, E., Nikolaidis, I., Miguel-Cruz, A., & Rios Rincon, A. M. (2016). Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 91, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.007
- Mihailidis, A., Cockburn, A., Longley, C., & Boger, J. (2008). The acceptability of home monitoring technology among community-dwelling older adults and baby boomers. Assistive Technology, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2008.10131929
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.