Significant effects on the environment and climate change have resulted from India’s shift from traditional building techniques to the growth of concrete jungles. Traditional structures used passive cooling, cross-ventilation, and the thoughtful use of courtyards and open spaces. They were made from natural materials that were sourced locally, such as clay, wood, stone, and thatch. Because they were made to use as little energy as possible, encourage natural temperature regulation, and blend in with the local environment, these buildings were naturally sustainable. Traditional architecture helped to lower carbon footprints and increase resilience to harsh weather events by utilizing low-embodied energy materials and supporting natural ecosystems. In contrast, the advent of concrete jungles, characterized by the extensive use of concrete, steel, and glass, has led to significant environmental challenges. The heat retention properties of concrete and glass exacerbate the urban heat island effect, leading to higher temperatures and greater energy consumption for cooling. Moreover, large-scale deforestation for urban expansion has reduced green cover, further impacting air quality and local climate. The heavy reliance on artificial lighting, air conditioning, and non-renewable resources in modern construction techniques has significantly increased greenhouse gas emissions. While some sustainable building practices are emerging, the shift to concrete-based urbanization has intensified climate change pressures in India.

Keywords:Concrete Jungles, Sustainable, Urban Heat Island Effect, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Sustainability

🔒 This is a subscription article

Full text is available to subscribers and institutional members. Please choose an option below to access it.

1. Aste N, Adhikari RS, Buzzetti M. Retrofitting traditional buildings: A cost-effective strategy to reduce energy consumption. Energy Procedia. 2013;42:273–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.066.

2. Estokova A, Wolfová Fabiánová M, Ondova M. Concrete structures and their impacts on climate change and water and raw material resource depletion. Int J Civ Eng. 2022;20(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00701-8.

3. Ganiron TU. Effects of lightweight materials in reducing heat transfer through building walls during high-temperature conditions. Energy Build. 2014;69:631–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.019.

4. Gibbons P, Ryan C. Resilience of traditional building methods to climate change. Build Res Inf. 2015;43(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1016409.
5. Hossain MU, Ng ST. Critical review of the carbon footprint of building construction in China: A life-cycle perspective. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;42:392–406.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.034.

6. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/.
7. Lal R. Managing soils for food security in central and South Asia. InThe Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus in Asia and the Pacific: Central and South Asia 2024 Aug 4 (pp. 31-59). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
8. Monteiro P. Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2006.
9. Phillipson MC, Emmanuel R, Baker PH. The durability of building materials under a changing climate. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2016 Jul;7(4):590-9.
10. Mark AA, Russell AO. A comparative study of Bamboo reinforced concrete beams using different stirrup materials for rural construction. International Journal of Civil & Structural Engineering. 2011;2(2):407-23.

Significant effects on the environment and climate change have resulted from India’s shift from traditional building techniques to the growth of concrete jungles. Traditional structures used passive cooling, cross-ventilation, and the thoughtful use of courtyards and open spaces. They were made from natural materials that were sourced locally, such as clay, wood, stone, and thatch. Because they were made to use as little energy as possible, encourage natural temperature regulation, and blend in with the local environment, these buildings were naturally sustainable. Traditional architecture helped to lower carbon footprints and increase resilience to harsh weather events by utilizing low-embodied energy materials and supporting natural ecosystems. In contrast, the advent of concrete jungles, characterized by the extensive use of concrete, steel, and glass, has led to significant environmental challenges. The heat retention properties of concrete and glass exacerbate the urban heat island effect, leading to higher temperatures and greater energy consumption for cooling. Moreover, large-scale deforestation for urban expansion has reduced green cover, further impacting air quality and local climate. The heavy reliance on artificial lighting, air conditioning, and non-renewable resources in modern construction techniques has significantly increased greenhouse gas emissions. While some sustainable building practices are emerging, the shift to concrete-based urbanization has intensified climate change pressures in India.

Keywords:Concrete Jungles, Sustainable, Urban Heat Island Effect, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Environmental Sustainability

🔒 This is a subscription article

Full text is available to subscribers and institutional members. Please choose an option below to access it.

1. Aste N, Adhikari RS, Buzzetti M. Retrofitting traditional buildings: A cost-effective strategy to reduce energy consumption. Energy Procedia. 2013;42:273–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.066.

2. Estokova A, Wolfová Fabiánová M, Ondova M. Concrete structures and their impacts on climate change and water and raw material resource depletion. Int J Civ Eng. 2022;20(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00701-8.

3. Ganiron TU. Effects of lightweight materials in reducing heat transfer through building walls during high-temperature conditions. Energy Build. 2014;69:631–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.019.

4. Gibbons P, Ryan C. Resilience of traditional building methods to climate change. Build Res Inf. 2015;43(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1016409.
5. Hossain MU, Ng ST. Critical review of the carbon footprint of building construction in China: A life-cycle perspective. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;42:392–406.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.034.

6. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/.
7. Lal R. Managing soils for food security in central and South Asia. InThe Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus in Asia and the Pacific: Central and South Asia 2024 Aug 4 (pp. 31-59). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
8. Monteiro P. Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2006.
9. Phillipson MC, Emmanuel R, Baker PH. The durability of building materials under a changing climate. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2016 Jul;7(4):590-9.
10. Mark AA, Russell AO. A comparative study of Bamboo reinforced concrete beams using different stirrup materials for rural construction. International Journal of Civil & Structural Engineering. 2011;2(2):407-23.