Determinants of Homeownership Satisfaction in Urban India: A Comparative Evaluation Across Housing Typologies in Lucknow

Volume: 11 | Issue: 02 | Year 2025 | Subscription
International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning
Received Date: 11/18/2025
Acceptance Date: 12/05/2025
Published On: 2025-12-15
First Page: 9
Last Page: 26

Journal Menu

By: Dr. Deepti Pande Rana.

Associate Professor, Department of Architecture and Planning, Amity University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Housing satisfaction is a multidimensional concept shaped by physical, social, psychological, neighborhood, and socio-demographic factors that collectively influence residents’ perceptions of their living environment. The habitability of a dwelling depends not only on its engineering and physical attributes but also on behavioral, cultural, interpersonal, and community characteristics. This study examines homeownership satisfaction across three major housing categories – private builder-constructed, government-constructed, and self-constructed houses – in Lucknow, India. Using an analytical research design, primary data were collected from 450 homeowners through semi-structured interview schedules, complemented by secondary data from national housing reports, census documents, and sector publications. The study investigates differences in satisfaction based on the built environment, socio-psychological environment, and neighborhood conditions, while also analyzing demographic influences. Findings indicate that a majority of respondents report medium to low levels of satisfaction across psychological environment (63.55%), neighborhood environment (66.0%), dwelling unit features (62.44%), support services (70.22%), public facilities (70.89%), and neighborhood facilities (72.0%). Significant differences in satisfaction were observed across age groups, gender, type of construction agency, income groups, educational status, and period of stay. However, some variables, such as household occupation in specific domains, showed no significant association with satisfaction. The study highlights critical gaps in built and social environments that affect homeownership satisfaction and offers recommendations for improving residential design, neighborhood planning, and support services. The findings may guide policymakers, urban planners, and housing agencies in developing more responsive and resident-centric housing environments.

Keywords: Homeowner satisfaction, built environment, neighborhood facilities, psychological well-being, urban housing, India, residential typologies

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Dr. Deepti Pande Rana Determinants of Homeownership Satisfaction in Urban India: A Comparative Evaluation Across Housing Typologies in Lucknow. International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning. 2025; 11(02): 9-26p.

How to cite this URL: Dr. Deepti Pande Rana, Determinants of Homeownership Satisfaction in Urban India: A Comparative Evaluation Across Housing Typologies in Lucknow. International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning. 2025; 11(02): 9-26p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijhhsp/article=22637

Refrences:

  1. Adams RE. Race and housing satisfaction: A review of research. J Urban Aff. 1992;14(3):209–27.
  2. Adinarayan S. Culture and housing behavi–. Indian J Soc Work. 1964;25(1):45–53.
  3. Aiello A, Ardone R, Scopelliti M. Residential satisfaction and quality of urban life. Environ Behav. 2010;42(2):140–72.
  4. Allen E. Residents’ satisfaction in urban neighbourhoods. Urban Stud. 1991;28(2):253–68.
  5. Billig M. Residents’ sense of community. Urban Aff Rev. 2005;41(2):161–89.
  6. Billingsley A. Family and social relations: Implications for residential satisfaction. J Soc Issues. 1992;48(1):85–102.
  7. Bonaiuto M, et al. Multidimensional environmental satisfaction scale. Environ Behav. 1999;31(3):416–40.
  8. Braubach M. Key issues of housing and health. WHO Rep. 2007.
  9. Brown B, Perkins D, Brown G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood. J Environ Psychol. 2005;23(3):259–71.
  10. Chapman D, Lombard J. Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 2006;79:487–508.
  11. Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. Wiley; 1977.
  12. Donnenwerth G, Guy R, Norvell M. Sociodemographic factors and residential satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 1978;6(3):243–55.
  13. Elliott M, Hayward RD. Religion and life satisfaction. J Sci Study Relig. 2009;48(2):286–300.
  14. Filkins R, et al. Residential satisfaction and community life. Rural Sociol. 2000;65(1):72–90.
  15. Fink, A. How to Sample in Surveys. Sage Publ; 1995.
  16. Galster GC. Homeowners and neighborhood satisfaction. Urban Stud. 1987;24(6):485–99.
  17. Galster GC, Hesser G. Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environ Behav. 1981;13(6):735–58.
  18. Grillo MC, Teixeira MA, Wilson DC. Residential satisfaction and sense of community. Environ Behav. 2010;42(1):64–86.
  19. Hebert Research Inc. Housing satisfaction survey. Bellevue, WA; 2003.
  20. Hur M, Morrow-Jones H. Factors affecting residential satisfaction. J Community Psychol. 2008;36(7):811–26.
  21. Ibem EO, Amole D. Residential satisfaction in public housing. Habitat Int. 2012;36(1):1–8.
  22. James D. Neighborhood satisfaction and community development. Soc Indic Res. 2008;85(1):53–70.
  23. Jaafar M, et al. Gender and residential satisfaction. J Hous Built Environ. 2006;21(1):1–18.
  24. Jorgensen B, Jamieson R, Martin J. Socioeconomic status and residential satisfaction. Urban Policy Res. 2010;28(2):141–55.
  25. Kingston R, Mitchell G, Florin D, Stevenson R. Urban environmental quality and residential satisfaction. J Environ Plann Manag. 1999;42(1):55–80.
  26. Levin J, Chatters L, Taylor R. Religion and life satisfaction among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1995;50B(6):285–93.
  27. Lu M. The number and size of relocations. Environ Behav. 1999;31(5):630–59.
  28. Lu M. Residential satisfaction and aspiration. Hous Stud. 2002;17(1):131–50.
  29. Mohan J, Twigg L. Residential satisfaction and socio-economic factors. Hous Stud. 2007;22(3):399–417.
  30. Mohit M, et al. Residential satisfaction in public housing. Habitat Int. 2010;34(1):18–27.
  31. Morgan K. Resident satisfaction survey design. Seattle Housing Authority; 2010.
  32. Mustapha AR, et al. Income and residential satisfaction. J Soc Dev Afr. 1995;10(2):75–90.
  33. Ogu V. Urban residential satisfaction. J Environ Stud. 2002;10(1):11–23.
  34. Okoye CO. Housing satisfaction assessment. Niger J Soc Sci. 2014.
  35. Parker M, Calhoun J. Age, marital status, and life satisfaction. J Aging Stud. 1996;10(3):267–84.
  36. Perez A, et al. Neighborhood satisfaction determinants. J Urban Aff. 2001;23(3):335–56.
  37. Salkind, N. Exploring Research. Prentice Hall; 1997.
  38. Salleh A, et al. Predictors of housing satisfaction. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 2012;11(2):371–8.
  39. Schwirian P, Schwirian K. Residents’ satisfaction and urban quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 1993;27:235–57.
  40. Selltiz C. Research Methods in Social Relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1966/1964.
  41. Shamai S, Ilatov Z. Sense of place and satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 2005;73(2):177–98.
  42. Simons H. Case Study Research in Practice. Sage, 2002.
  43. Thomas W, Holmes M. Gender and housing satisfaction. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22:1421–40.
  44. Varady D, Carrozza M. Toward a better way to measure residential satisfaction. Hous Stud. 2000;15(6):797–825.
  45. Varady D, Preiser W. Measuring homeowner satisfaction. J Archit Plann Res. 1998;15(3):237–52.
  46. Vera-Toscano E, Ateca-Amestoy V. The relevance of social interactions in residential satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 2008;86:257–74.
  47. Wasserman, I. Age and residential satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 1982;11(3):299–317.
  48. Young PV. Scientific Social Surveys and Research. Prentice Hall, 1967.

 Previous Article
Next Article

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Powered by