By: Lyngksiar N. Khongwir
Structure Designer at NECTAR, Govt. of India and PhD Student, Univercidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto (Catholic University of Portugal), Portugal.
This paper explores the theoretical frameworks that underpin the study of cultural landscapes in the context of India. It encompasses various perspectives, each offering unique insights into the intricate narratives woven into the land. The discussion begins with an examination of cultural geography, emphasizing the evolving conceptions of ‘culture’ and its relationship with geography. Ethnoarchaeology is then introduced as a method to understand the interplay between artifact variability and human behavior, shedding light on how contemporary practices shape cultural landscapes. The concept of sacred geography delves into the spiritual significance attributed to certain landscapes, while the anthropology of space considers the cultural meanings embedded in landscapes and their symbolic representation. Additionally, Indigenous Knowledge Systems are highlighted for their role in preserving traditional wisdom and shaping cultural landscapes over generations. This review aims to offer a thorough understanding of the varied narratives present in Indian cultural landscapes through diverse theoretical perspectives.
Indian cultural landscapes, theoretical frameworks, sacred landscapes, cultural geography.
Citation:
Refrences:
- Â Gibson C, Waitt G. Cultural geography. In: International encyclopedia of human geography.
2009; p. 411-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00932-9. - Woodward K, Jones JP. The condition of postmodernity (1989): David Harvey. London: SAGE
Publications; 2008. - Â Longacre W. Ethnoarchaeology. In: International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral
sciences. 2001; p. 4842-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02046-5. -  Panakhyo M, McGrath S. Ecological anthropology. n.d. Available from  https://anthropology.ua.edu/theory/ecologicalanthropology/#:~:text=Julian%20Steward%20(1902
- Â Manibabu M. Salvage ethnoarchaeological research in Northeast India: perspective and
practicality. In: Anthropology in North East India. Gyan Publishing House; 2018. -  Thorley A. Sacred geography: a conceptual work in progress. In: SPICA postgraduate journal for  cosmology in culture. 2016; p. 4-8. The Sophia Centre Press.
- Â Eck DL. Banaras: City of light. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc; 1982.
- Â Haberman DL. [Review of India: a sacred geography, by D. L. Eck]. J Am Acad Rel.
2013;81(1):278–81. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23357889. -  Aucoin PM. Toward an anthropological understanding of space and place. In: Janz B, editor.
Place, space and hermeneutics. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 5. Cham: Springer; 2017.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_28. - Â Hales Y. Anthropology of space. 2021. Available from:
https://www.talkingstreets.co.uk/2021/06/05/anthropology-of-space/. - Tuke SL. Partnerships for indigenous knowledge landscapes. Afr J Landscape Archit. 2021; Issue 04: Article 06. Available from: https://www.ajlajournal.org/articles/when-landscapes-grow-from-
indigenous-knowledge-systems. - Thakur N. Indian cultural landscapes: religious pluralism, tolerance and ground reality. J SPA:
New Dimensions in Research of Environments for Living “The Sacred”. 2011; no. 3, Monsoon. - Singh RPB. Indian cultural landscape vis-Ã -vis ecological cosmology: a vision for the 21st
century. Ann NAGI. 2013;33(2):36–62. - Khanna NP. Cultural landscapes: an approach to heritage management in India. 2006. Available from: https://www.beyondbuilt.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Cultural_Landscapes_Full Article_2006.pdf
- Sinha A. The sacred landscape of Braj, India. Landsc J. 2014; The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.