Assess the preference towards mode of delivery and its associating factors with a view to arrange nurses led intervention among antenatal mothers attending GOPD, A Hospital based descriptive study

Volume: 10 | Issue: 02 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Obstetrics, Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing
Received Date: 08/05/2024
Acceptance Date: 09/30/2024
Published On: 2024-10-21
First Page: 1
Last Page: 9

Journal Menu

By: Kirti and Sunita Kumari

1Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak.
2Principal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak.

Abstract

Background: Delivery mechanism is a spontaneous process with implemented advances in medical technology now has drastically reduced maternal and infant mortality. For a healthy women population, the choice between spontaneous vaginal delivery caesarean section. Vaginal delivery can be spontaneous i.e. unassisted or assisted and caesarian section is most commonly performed major obstetric throughout the world. Objective: To assess the preference towards mode of delivery among antenatal mothers in GOPD, PGIMS Rohtak. To assess the associating factors of mode of delivery among antenatal mothers in GOPD, PGIMS, Rohtak. Methodology: For this study, a descriptive research design employing a quantitative approach was utilized among 100 expectant mothers attending the Gynecology Outpatient Department at PGIMS, Rohtak. Convenient sampling technique was employed for participant selection, and data collection was conducted through a self-structured interview schedule questionnaire. Analysis of the data was performed using both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Results: Majority 63% of antenatal mothers give the preference towards the vaginal delivery remaining 37% give preference caesarean section. Associating factors of Preference towards cesarean section. Majority factors are fear of labor pain or vaginal examination (73%), less risky and less chances of perineal rupture (76%) Factors of vaginal delivery Less suffering and better recovery (82%), Fear of surgical operation and anesthesia (78%). The association of associating factors of vaginal delivery or cesarean section with demographic variables are non-significant. The association of associating factor (fear of associated vaginal delivery and longer duration) is statistically significant. (p>0/05) with family monthly income χ2/p-value (8.391/.039).


Keywords: Effectiveness, vaginal delivery, caesarean section, antenatal mothers.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Kirti and Sunita Kumari, Assess the preference towards mode of delivery and its associating factors with a view to arrange nurses led intervention among antenatal mothers attending GOPD, A Hospital based descriptive study. International Journal of Obstetrics, Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing. 2024; 10(02): 1-9p.

How to cite this URL: Kirti and Sunita Kumari, Assess the preference towards mode of delivery and its associating factors with a view to arrange nurses led intervention among antenatal mothers attending GOPD, A Hospital based descriptive study. International Journal of Obstetrics, Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing. 2024; 10(02): 1-9p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijopnn/article=12549
Full Text

Refrences:

1. Darwish DS, Fiala LE, Refaat AH. Factors influencing the decision-making process regarding mode of delivery among women attending primary health care units in Ismailia district. International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine. 2019;2(2):34-42.
2. Al-Rifai RH, Elbarazi I, Ali N, Loney T, Oulhaj A, Ahmed LA. Knowledge and Preference Towards Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba’ah Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 23;18(1):36. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010036. PMID: 33374611; PMCID: PMC7793149.
3. Jansen L, Gibson M, Bowles BC, Leach J. First do no harm: interventions during childbirth. J Perinat Educ. 2013 Spring;22(2):83-92. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.22.2.83. PMID: 24421601; PMCID: PMC3647734.
4. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):436-7. PMID: 2863457.
5. Keshk EA, Alghamdi GS, Alghamdi MA, Alzahrani MS, Alzahrani RM, Alzahrani AS, Alzahrani RS. Knowledge and Attitude Toward Modes of Delivery and Possible Complications Among Women in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2024 May 9;16(5):e59988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59988. PMID: 38854325; PMCID: PMC11162276.
6. Albokhary AA, James JP. Does cesarean section have an impact on the successful initiation of breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia? Saudi Med J. 2014 Nov;35(11):1400-3. PMID: 25399221; PMCID: PMC4362139.
7. Neu J, Rushing J. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: long-term infant outcomes and the hygiene hypothesis. Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):321-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.008. PMID: 21645799; PMCID: PMC3110651.
8. Yamasmit W, Chaithongwongwatthana S. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2012 Jul 5; 95(5): 619.
9. Khosravi P, Pirdadeh Beiranvand S, Beiranvand B, Khalesi ZB. Relationship between Primigravid women’s awareness, attitude, fear of childbirth, and mode of delivery preference. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Jan 25;14:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100143. PMID: 35141516; PMCID: PMC8814374.
10. Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Tamma E, Seffah J. Preferred mode of childbirth among women attending antenatal clinic at a tertiary hospital in Ghana: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2022 Jun;22(2):480-488. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.56. PMID: 36407389; PMCID: PMC9652646.
11. Li WY, Liabsuetrakul T, Stray-Pedersen B. Effect of mode of delivery on perceived risks of maternal health outcomes among expectant parents: a cohort study in Beijing, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-12. PMID: 24410828; PMCID: PMC3898524.
12. Moosavi A, Sheikhlou SG, Sheikhlou SG, Abdolahi K, Yaminifar L, Maktabi M. Influencing factors in choosing delivery method: Iranian primiparous women’s perspective. Electron Physician. 2017 Apr 25;9(4):4150-4154. doi: 10.19082/4150. PMID: 28607649; PMCID: PMC5459286.
13. Khosravi P, Pirdadeh Beiranvand S, Beiranvand B, Khalesi ZB. Relationship between Primigravid women’s awareness, attitude, fear of childbirth, and mode of delivery preference. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2022 Jan 25;14:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100143. PMID: 35141516; PMCID: PMC8814374.
14. Verma A, Singh S, Nagargoje MM, Mishra SK, Singh S, Awasthi S. An analysis of preferences and practices related to the mode of delivery in Agra district of Uttar Pradesh. Int J Community Med Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 27 [cited 2024 Oct. 17];8(11):5310-7. Available from: https://www.ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/view/8888

15. Kaur, Ms. Varinder. Assessment of Birth Preparedness Practices and Preferences towards delivery among Primigravida Women in North India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology. (2020) 7(2):225-234.
16. Gondwe T, Betha K, Kusneniwar GN, Bunker CH, Tang G, Simhan H, Reddy PS, Haggerty CL. Mode of delivery and short-term infant health outcomes: a prospective cohort study in a peri-urban Indian population. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1324-3. PMID: 30400845; PMCID: PMC6220445.
17. Zamani-Alavijeh F, Shahry P, Kalhori M, Araban M. Pregnant women’s preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties. J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Apr 19;6:20. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.204738. PMID: 28546985; PMCID: PMC5433639.
18. Nasir NA, Amir H. Knowledge and attitude of pregnant women towards modes of delivery in an antenatal care clinic in Baghdad. J Fac Med Baghdad [Internet]. 2017 Apr. 2 [cited 2024 Oct. 17];59(1):25-30. Available from: https://www.iqjmc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/19JFacMedBaghdad36/article/view/152.
19. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Gutierrez L, Gibbons L, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Izbizky GH, Ferrary M, Viergue N, Vigil SI, Zalazar Denett G, Belizán JM. Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0. PMID: 26857448; PMCID: PMC4746891.
20. Welay FT, Gebresilassie B, Asefa GG, Mengesha MB. Delivery Mode Preference and Associated Factors among Pregnant Mothers in Harar Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 10;2021:1751578. doi: 10.1155/2021/1751578. PMID: 34055969; PMCID: PMC8131132.
21. Sindiani A, Rawashdeh H, Obeidat N, Zayed F. Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2020 Jul 1;55:124-30
22. Tenaw Z, Kassa ZY, Kassahun G, Ayenew A. Maternal Preference, Mode of Delivery and Associated Factors among Women Who Gave Birth at Public and Private Hospitals in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. Ann Glob Health. 2019 Aug 19;85(1):115. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2578. PMID: 31441629; PMCID: PMC6706999.
23. Kalyan SSG, Bhardwaj G, Shafqat N, Verma M. Preferences and factors determining preferences for mode of delivery among primigravida mothers. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Apr;13(4):1517-1523. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1365_23. Epub 2024 Apr 22. PMID: 38827725; PMCID: PMC11142001.
24. Saxena RK, Ansari NF, Balan A. Factors influencing women’s choice of mode of delivery in rural Bangalore, India. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2019 Jan;6(1):71-7.
25. Suwandaarachchi S, Prathapan S. Preference and associated factors for the caesarean section as a mode of delivery among primi-pregnant mothers attending selected antenatal clinics of Bandaragama Medical Officer of Health in Sri Lanka. JCCPSL 2018, 24 (3) Special Edition. Available online at: http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/bitstream/handle/123456789/8633/Preference%20and%20associated%20factors%20for%20the%20caesarean%20section%20as%20a%20mode%20of%20delivery%20among%20primi-pregnant%20mothers%20attending%20selected%20antenatal%20clinics%20of%20Bandaragama%20Medical%20Officer%20of%20Health%20in%20Sri%20Lanka.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
26. Bahri, N., Mohebi, S., Bahri, N., Davoudi Farimani, S., Khodadoost, L. Factors related to the decision making process of primigravid women about mode of delivery: A theory-based study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, 2017; 20(8): 42-50. doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2017.9589.
27. Ghadimi R, Izadpanah F, Zarghami A, Rajabi M, Baleghi M, Basirat Z. Effective factors for choosing the delivery method in primiparous women in babol, Iran. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2013 Nov 10;15(6):52-8.
28. Shah R, Rehfuess EA, Maskey MK, Fischer R, Bhandari PB, Delius M. Factors affecting institutional delivery in rural Chitwan district of Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 13;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0454-y. PMID: 25884164; PMCID: PMC4339648.
29. Yilmaz SD, Bal MD, Beji NK, Uludag S. Women’s Preferences of Method of Delivery and Influencing Factors. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Aug;15(8):683-9. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11532. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PMID: 24578835; PMCID: PMC3918192.
30. Abd El-Aziz SN, Mansour S, Hassan NF. Factors associated with fear of childbirth: It’s effect on women’s preference for elective cesarean section. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2017;7(1):133-46.

 Previous Article
Next Article