Some Thermal Properties of Banana (Musa acuminata) Peels Bonded Waterlily (Nymphaea lotus Linn.) Briquettes

Volume: 11 | Issue: 01 | Year 2025 | Subscription
International Journal of Renewable Energy and its Commercialization
Received Date: 02/05/2025
Acceptance Date: 02/10/2025
Published On: 2025-03-18
First Page:
Last Page:

Journal Menu


By: Karikarisei T and Davies R.M.

1 Karikarisei, Research Scholar, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
2 Davies, R.M., Professor, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine how the amount of binder affected the ignition time and rate of burning of fuel briquettes made from a blend of banana (Musa acuminata) and waterlily (Nymphaea lotus Linn.) peels at varying binder ratios (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80% by weight of each feedstock). Before the briquettes were expelled for additional research, the homogenous feedstock was compressed by a hydraulic press at a pressure level of 5 MPas and a dwell period of 20 seconds. The steel cylindrical die had dimensions of 14.21 cm in height and 2.14 cm in diameter. Fixed carbon ranged from 16.68 to 25.38, volatile matter from 50.5 to 56.8, ash from 15.4 to 18.2, and calorific value from 24751 kJ/kg to 25737 kJ/kg, according to the study’s findings. The results of this study are appropriate for domestic and small-scale industrial heating applications since they exceed the standard minimum calorific value of 17000 kj/kg for fuel sources (DIN 51731:1996-10). Because the ash content increased and the calorific value decreased beyond 60%, it can be concluded that the ideal amount of binder recommended for the production of waterlily banana peels’ bonded briquettes is at 60% and below, even though the combustion properties generally improved with an increase in binder concentration. Increasing the binder ratio and decreasing the particle size resulted in a decrease in the burning rate, but it also prolonged the briquettes’ ignition period.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Karikarisei T and Davies R.M Some Thermal Properties of Banana (Musa acuminata) Peels Bonded Waterlily (Nymphaea lotus Linn.) Briquettes. International Journal of Renewable Energy and its Commercialization. 2025; 11(01): -p.

How to cite this URL: Karikarisei T and Davies R.M, Some Thermal Properties of Banana (Musa acuminata) Peels Bonded Waterlily (Nymphaea lotus Linn.) Briquettes. International Journal of Renewable Energy and its Commercialization. 2025; 11(01): -p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijrec/article=15576

Refrences:

  1. Adegoke CO. Preliminary investigation of sawdust as high-grade solid fuel. J Renew Energy. 1999;1-2:102–7.
  2. Kaur A, Roy M, Kundu K. Densification of biomass by briquetting: A review. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2017;8(10):20561-8.
  3. ASTM standard E711-87. Standard test method for gross calorific value of refuse-derived fuel by the bomb calorimeter. Annu Book ASTM Stand. 2004;11.04. Available from: http://www.astm.info/standard/E711.htm.
  4. Moses DR, Augustina DO. Some physical and mechanical properties of water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) briquettes. Am J Sci Technol. 2014;1(5):238-44.
  5. Davies RM, Davies OA. Physical and combustion characteristics of briquettes made from water hyacinth and phytoplankton scum as binder. J Combust. 2013;2013:1-7.
  6. Davies OA, Tawari CC. Season and tide effects on sediment characteristics of Trans-Okpoka Creek, Upper Bonny Estuary, Nigeria. Agric Biol J North Am. 2010;1(2):89-96.
  7. Davies RM, Davies OA. Effect of briquetting process variables on hygroscopic property of water hyacinth briquettes. J Renew Energy. 2013;2013:429230.
  8. Davies RM, Abolude DS. Mechanical handling characteristics of briquettes produced from water hyacinth and plantain peel as binder. J Sci Res Rep. 2013;2(1):93-103.
  9. Emerhi EA. Physical and combustion properties of briquettes produced from sawdust of three hardwood species and different organic binders. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2011;2(6):236-46.
  10. Wilaipon P. Density equation of bio-coal briquettes and quantity of maize cob in Phitsanulok, Thailand. Am J Appl Sci. 2008;5(12):1808-11.
  11. Nkemdirim OV. Effects of different binders on the physical and combustion properties of dried leaves briquettes [M.Eng. Thesis]. Nsukka, Nigeria: Univ Nigeria; 2014.
  12. Olugbade TO, Ojo OT. Binder-less briquetting technology for lignite briquettes: A review. Energy Ecol Environ. 2021;6:69–79.
  13. Onuegbu TU, Ekpunobi UE, Ogbu IM, Ekeoma MO, Obumselu FO. Comparative studies of ignition time and water boiling test of coal and biomass briquettes blend. IJRRAS. 2011;7(2):153-9.
  14. Jekayinfa SO, Omisakin OS. The energy production of some agricultural wastes as local fuel materials in Nigeria. Agric Eng Int CIGR E-J Sci Res Dev. 2005;VII:EE 05 003:10-9.
  15. Chaney JO. Combustion characteristics of biomass briquettes [Ph.D. thesis]. Nottingham, UK: Univ Nottingham; 2010.
  16. Chin OC, Siddiqui KM. Characteristics of some biomass briquettes prepared under modest die pressures. Biomass Bioenergy. 2000;18:223–8.
  17. Oladeji JT. Fuel characterization of briquettes produced from corncob and rice husk residues. Pac J Sci Technol. 2010;11(1):101-6.
  18. Loo SV, Koppejan J. A handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. London: Earthscan; 2008.
  19. Demirbas A. Yield of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel. 2001;80(13):1885-91.
  20. Ribeiro GF, Junior AB. The global energy matrix and use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production: A review. Waste Manag Res. 2023;41(8):1283-304.
  21. Karikarisei T, Moses DR. Some handling characteristics of cassava peels bonded briquettes. Int J Innov Math Stat Energy Policies. 2024;12(2):72-80.
  22. Rodriguesa AJ, Oderob MO, Kerichc D, Odundod F, Akunoe W. Up scaling invasive plant biomass briquette production: Case of Kendu Bay, Lake Victoria, Kenya. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2017;4(4):10-30.
  23. Mustafa BG, Yaumi AL, Aji MM, Highina BK. Comparative studies on the combustion performance of briquettes produced from selected biomass residues in Maiduguri. World J Energy Sci Eng. 2015;1(1):1-8.
  24. Bailey RT, Blankenhorn PR. Charcoal production, improvement for rural development. 1st ed. Vol 1. 1982. p. 61-70.
  25. Onuegbu TU, Ogbu IM, Ilochi NO, Ekpunobi UE, Ogbuagu AS. Enhancing the properties of coal briquette using spear grass (Imperata Cylindrica). Leonardo J Sci. 2010;17:47-58.
  26. Felix M, Gheewala SH. A review of biomass energy dependency in Tanzania. Energy Procedia. 2011;9:338-43.
  27. Sotannde OA, Oluyege AO, Aba GB. Physical and combustion properties of charcoal briquettes from neem wood residues. Int Agrophys. 2010;24:189-94.