Generally, in any analysis method adopted in the construction industries it should be useful for the stability, economy and strength point of view. For such structures the different analysis method is adopted based on the requirement of the building. From which the structure loads and  other loads are coming over the structure are calculated and applied over foundation. But in practical execution the method of working is a little bit different where step by step construction sequence is used and for such condition the load over structure create the larger displacement and deformation because of not getting full strength in structural members. Similarly, nonlinear structure needs to check over micro level of consideration in which geometric non-linearity cause measure effect to the structure.

Keywords:Rcc Structure, Etabs software, FEM, IS456, IS1893.

🔒 This is a subscription article

Full text is available to subscribers and institutional members. Please choose an option below to access it.

1. Aijaj SA, Deshmukh GS. Seismic analysis of vertically irregular building. SRTMU’s Res J Sci. 2013;2:101-11.
2. Arlekar JN, Jain SK, Murty CV. Seismic response of RC frame buildings with soft first storeys. In: Proceedings of the CBRI golden jubilee conference on natural hazards in urban habitat. 1997 Nov;13-24.
3. Standard I. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards Part. 1893;1.
4. Ravikumar CM, Babu Narayan KS, Sujith BV, Venkat Reddy D. Effect of irregular configurations on seismic vulnerability of RC buildings. Archit Res. 2012;2(3):20-6.
5. Poonam AK, Gupta AK. Study of response of structurally irregular building frames to seismic excitations. Int J Civil Struct Environ Infrastruct Eng Res Dev. 2012;2(2):25-31.
6. Sultan MR, Peera DG. Dynamic analysis of Multi-storey building for different shapes. Int J Innov Res Adv Eng. 2015 Aug;2(8):85.
7. Sharma S, Pastariya S. Effect of floating column on seismic response of multistory building. Int J Adv Sci Res Eng Technol. 2020 Dec;5(12). Available from https://www.ijasret.com/VolumeArticles/FullTextPDF/623_17.EFFECT_OF_FLOATING_COLUMN_7676.pdf
8. Georgievich TA, Alireza M, Varagh B, Zahrai SM, Negahdar H. Study of monolithic high-rise buildings with transfer floors under progressive destruction in the nonlinear formulation. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Lisboa. 2012.
9. Vafai A, Ghabdian M, Estekanchi HE, Desai CS. Calculation of creep and shrinkage in tall concrete buildings using nonlinear staged construction analysis.
10. Zhua Y, Sub RK. Influence of local deformations of transfer structures on seismic design. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2008 Oct 12-17.
11. Van De Graaf AV. Sequentially linear analysis as an alternative to nonlinear analysis applied to a reinforced glass beam. In: 7th fib PhD Symposium. Delft, Netherlands; 2008.
12. Su RK. Seismic behavior of buildings with transfer structures in low-to-moderate seismicity regions. Electron J Struct Eng. 2008 Mar 28;1:99-109.
13. Yang WH. Large deformation of structures by sequential limit analysis. Int J Solids Struct. 1993 Jan 1;30(7):1001-13.
14. Raju KK, Rao GV, Raju IS. Effect of geometric nonlinearity on the free flexural vibrations of moderately thick rectangular plates. Comput Struct. 1978 Nov 1;9(5):441-4.

Generally, in any analysis method adopted in the construction industries it should be useful for the stability, economy and strength point of view. For such structures the different analysis method is adopted based on the requirement of the building. From which the structure loads and  other loads are coming over the structure are calculated and applied over foundation. But in practical execution the method of working is a little bit different where step by step construction sequence is used and for such condition the load over structure create the larger displacement and deformation because of not getting full strength in structural members. Similarly, nonlinear structure needs to check over micro level of consideration in which geometric non-linearity cause measure effect to the structure.

Keywords:Rcc Structure, Etabs software, FEM, IS456, IS1893.

🔒 This is a subscription article

Full text is available to subscribers and institutional members. Please choose an option below to access it.

1. Aijaj SA, Deshmukh GS. Seismic analysis of vertically irregular building. SRTMU’s Res J Sci. 2013;2:101-11.
2. Arlekar JN, Jain SK, Murty CV. Seismic response of RC frame buildings with soft first storeys. In: Proceedings of the CBRI golden jubilee conference on natural hazards in urban habitat. 1997 Nov;13-24.
3. Standard I. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards Part. 1893;1.
4. Ravikumar CM, Babu Narayan KS, Sujith BV, Venkat Reddy D. Effect of irregular configurations on seismic vulnerability of RC buildings. Archit Res. 2012;2(3):20-6.
5. Poonam AK, Gupta AK. Study of response of structurally irregular building frames to seismic excitations. Int J Civil Struct Environ Infrastruct Eng Res Dev. 2012;2(2):25-31.
6. Sultan MR, Peera DG. Dynamic analysis of Multi-storey building for different shapes. Int J Innov Res Adv Eng. 2015 Aug;2(8):85.
7. Sharma S, Pastariya S. Effect of floating column on seismic response of multistory building. Int J Adv Sci Res Eng Technol. 2020 Dec;5(12). Available from https://www.ijasret.com/VolumeArticles/FullTextPDF/623_17.EFFECT_OF_FLOATING_COLUMN_7676.pdf
8. Georgievich TA, Alireza M, Varagh B, Zahrai SM, Negahdar H. Study of monolithic high-rise buildings with transfer floors under progressive destruction in the nonlinear formulation. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Lisboa. 2012.
9. Vafai A, Ghabdian M, Estekanchi HE, Desai CS. Calculation of creep and shrinkage in tall concrete buildings using nonlinear staged construction analysis.
10. Zhua Y, Sub RK. Influence of local deformations of transfer structures on seismic design. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2008 Oct 12-17.
11. Van De Graaf AV. Sequentially linear analysis as an alternative to nonlinear analysis applied to a reinforced glass beam. In: 7th fib PhD Symposium. Delft, Netherlands; 2008.
12. Su RK. Seismic behavior of buildings with transfer structures in low-to-moderate seismicity regions. Electron J Struct Eng. 2008 Mar 28;1:99-109.
13. Yang WH. Large deformation of structures by sequential limit analysis. Int J Solids Struct. 1993 Jan 1;30(7):1001-13.
14. Raju KK, Rao GV, Raju IS. Effect of geometric nonlinearity on the free flexural vibrations of moderately thick rectangular plates. Comput Struct. 1978 Nov 1;9(5):441-4.