This study presents the design and finite-element analysis (FEM) of three reinforced cement concrete (RCC) column configurations under seismic effect, with the objective of quantifying how a central Sal-timber core alters the structural performance of an otherwise conventional RCC column. All three columns are of identical external size (300 × 300 mm) and clear height 3.0 m, fixed at both ends, and use M30 concrete, Fe500 steel, 4–16 mm φ longitudinal bars (steel ratio 0.89 %) and 8 mm φ ties at 150 mm c/c. The configurations are a plain RCC column (C1), and two timber-composite RCC columns with 100 × 100 mm (C2) and 150 × 150 mm (C3) Sal-timber cores. Each column is idealized as a fixed-fixed line member discretized into six Euler-Bernoulli beam elements, using transformed-section properties (modular ratios m = 7.30 for steel and n = 0.456 for timber). Axial capacity is computed per IS 456:2000, modal and elastic-buckling behavior from the FEM stiffness, and seismic demand by the equivalent-static method of IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for Zone V. The results show that, because the timber core sits near the neutral axis, flexural rigidity falls only 0.6 % (C2) and 3.1 % (C3) and lateral drift is practically unchanged, while self-weight drops 7 % and 16 % respectively, reducing seismic base shear and end moments by a similar margin. The principal penalty is a reduction in ultimate axial capacity of 6 % (C2) and 13 % (C3). All three columns remain short (buckling never governs), satisfy the 0.4 % drift limit, and plot safely within the P–M interaction envelope. The 100 × 100 mm timber core offers the best balance of weight and seismic-demand reduction with negligible loss of capacity.

[1] Azanaw, G. M. (2025). Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends, Advanced Modeling Approaches, and Future Research Frontiers for Sustainable Hybrid Construction. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20251003.14 [2] Dias, A., Schanzlin, J., & Dietsch, P. (Eds.) (2018). Design of Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A State-of- the-Art Report by COST Action FP1402 / WG 4. Shaker Verlag. [3] Rodwell, J., & Neave, M. (2022). A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures. Sustainability, 14(9), 5570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095570 [4] Zhang, et al. (2024). Axial compressive performance of cruciform timber-encased steel composite columns: Experimental investigation and buckling analysis through 3D laser scanning. Engineering Structures / Composite Structures (ScienceDirect S0263823124004117). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024 [5] Timber-encased steel composite (TESC) columns — finite-element study of axial load distribution and buckling behaviour of columns with embedded H-section steel (ResearchGate state-of-art on steel-timber-(concrete) structures). [6] Steel-timber composite (STC) column consisting of H-shaped steel and glulam — axial compression of 22 large- scale 2 m columns. Engineering Structures (ScienceDirect S0141029619345158). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019 [7] Numerical analysis on seismic behavior of a novel steel-timber composite frame column (2024). Engineering Research Express, 6, IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad476c [8] Finite Element Modeling of Beam-to-Column Steel-Timber Composite Joints with Different Parameters (2024). Buildings, 14(9), 2858, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092858 [9] Experimental investigation of timber samples under triaxial compression conditions / timber-infilled steel tube (TIST) columns (2022). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710222009044). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022 [10] Chun, Q., et al. (2021). Experimental Study on Axial Compression Behavior of Circular Timber Columns Strengthened with CFRP Strips and Near-Surface Mounted Steel Bars. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 147(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002931 [11] Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined laminated timber columns (2023). Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 24, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00827-z [12] Three-dimensional finite element analysis of reinforced concrete columns with FRP and/or steel confinement (2015). Engineering Structures (ScienceDirect S014102961500173X). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015 [13] Experimental research and finite element analysis on seismic behavior of square reinforced concrete columns with four interlocking spirals (2022). Structures (ScienceDirect S2352012422001916). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022 [14] Finite element study on seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge pier with kinked rebars (2024). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2024-0090 [15] Non-linear finite element analysis of SFRC beam-column joints under cyclic loading: enhancing ductility and structural integrity (2024). Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69270-1 [16] Numerical simulation of reverse cyclic loading in precast column and pocket foundation connection (2026). Scientific Reports, 16 (modelled per IS 456 and IS 13920). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36686-w [17] Influence of slab composite effect on the seismic performance of a six-story timber-concrete composite moment- resisting frame (2025). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710225000518). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025 [18] Hybrid timber-based structures: A state of the art review (2022). Construction and Building Materials (ScienceDirect S0950061822031610). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022 [19] Study on Seismic Performance of Composite Structures with Reinforced Concrete Columns and Masonry Walls (2025). Buildings, 15(24), 4481, MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244481 [20] Seismic behavior of an innovative prefabricated steel-concrete composite beam-column joint (2023). Journal of Building Engineering (ScienceDirect S2352710223013918). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023 [21] IS 456:2000 — Plain and Reinforced Concrete — Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [22] IS 13920:2016 — Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces —Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [23] IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 — Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [24] Nilesh B. Gawali, Sunil B. Thakare, & Dattatray P. Kambale. (2025). "Optimizing Structural Performance: A Review of RCC, Steel, And Timber Combinations In Civil Engineering". https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14854924