Enhancing the strength and flexibility of crowns and bridges: advances in materials, design, and nanotechnology.

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Year 2026 |
International journal of Nanobiotechnology
Received Date: 02/11/2026
Acceptance Date: 03/27/2026
Published On: 2026-04-01
First Page:
Last Page:

Journal Menu


By: Sukhmeet Kaur Bedi and Atul Khajuria.

Sukhmeet Kaur Bedi, Department of Dental Surgery, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur – Chandigarh Rd, VPO, Bohan, Hoshiarpur, Punjab 146001.
ATUL KHAJURIA, Dean, Department of Allied & Health Care Sciences, Rayat Bahra Professional University, Hoshiarpur – Chandigarh Rd, VPO, Bohan, Hoshiarpur, Punjab 146001

Abstract

The continuous advancement in restorative dentistry has led to the integration of nanotechnology in the fabrication of crowns and bridges, significantly enhancing their mechanical and functional performance. Nano-enhanced materials, including nanoparticle-reinforced resin matrices, nanostructured ceramics, and nano-modified adhesive systems, demonstrate superior properties compared to conventional materials. These improvements are largely attributed to the uniform dispersion of nanoparticles, which enhances filler–matrix bonding, increases surface interaction, and reduces microstructural defects, resulting in improved flexural strength, fracture toughness, wear resistance, and marginal adaptation. In resin-based systems, nanofillers such as silica, zirconia, and alumina improve polymer cross-linking and reduce polymerization shrinkage, thereby minimizing marginal gaps and microleakage. Similarly, nano-engineered ceramics exhibit refined grain structures that enhance resistance to crack propagation and fatigue under occlusal forces. Nano-modified adhesive systems further strengthen bonding to enamel and dentin through improved penetration and hybrid layer formation. Despite these advancements, translating in vitro and short-term clinical benefits into predictable long-term outcomes remains a challenge. Current evidence supports improved medium-term performance (3–7 years), particularly in wear resistance, color stability, and marginal integrity. However, long-term data beyond 5–10 years are limited, and isolating the specific contribution of nanotechnology remains difficult due to variability in clinical conditions and study designs. In conclusion, while nanotechnology has significantly improved the short- to medium-term performance of crowns and bridges, further longitudinal clinical studies are required to validate long-term durability and optimize its clinical application.

Keywords:  nanoenhanced materials, zirconia frameworks, resin nanoceramic CAD CAM, allceramic
crowns.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Sukhmeet Kaur Bedi and Atul Khajuria Enhancing the strength and flexibility of crowns and bridges: advances in materials, design, and nanotechnology.. International journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2026; 12(1): -p.

How to cite this URL: Sukhmeet Kaur Bedi and Atul Khajuria, Enhancing the strength and flexibility of crowns and bridges: advances in materials, design, and nanotechnology.. International journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2026; 12(1): -p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/uncategorized/article=25260

Refrences:

  1. Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A five-year randomized clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. J Dent. 2013;41(7):58392.​
  2. Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A 7year randomized prospective study of nanohybrid and conventional composite restorations in posterior teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2014;122(2):1507.
  3. Baroudi K, et al. A 3year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM partial crowns and lithium disilicate restorations. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(16):5601.​
  4. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of allceramic and metalceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):7385.​
  5. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):299307.
  6. Sorrentino R, De Simone G, Tetè S, Russo S, Zarone F. Five-year prospective clinical study of
    posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(3):97785.
  7. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina, feldspar, leucite, mica and zirconia-based ceramics. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):37282.​
  8. Khan AS, et al. Nanotechnology and its application in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(5):2143.
  9. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):138290.​
  10. Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Stansbury JW. Longterm mechanical durability of dental nanocomposites. Dent Mater. 2012;28(3):21928.​
  11. Schwendicke F, et al. Emerging applications of nanotechnology in dentistry: current trends and future perspectives. J Dent. 2023;132:104531.
  12. Bapat RA, et al. Role of nanotechnology in dentistry: a systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(6):53541.​
  13. Freitas RA Jr. Nanodentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(11):155966.
  14. Ramesh S, et al. Nanodentistry: is it just a fiction or a future? Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(Suppl 3): S1719.​
  15. Priyadarshini BM, et al. Nanotechnology in dentistry: Present and future. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):1417.​
  16. Arora N, Srivastava N, Tiwari R. Nanotechnology and its application in dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012;2(3):20712.
  17. Elsharkawy LM, et al. Nanotechnology in dentistry: bridging science and practice. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025;26(4):34553.​
  18. Besinis A, et al. Nanoparticles in dentistry: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2015;30(1):16271.​
  19. Elsharkawy FM, et al. Nanotechnology in contemporary dentistry: a comprehensive review. Int
    J Community Med Public Health. 2026;13(1):110.​
  20. Kohal RJ, et al. Flexural strengths of implant-supported zirconia-based bridges: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(5):103744.​
  21. Ünalan Değer E, et al. Longterm tensile bond strength of differently cemented nanocomposite CAD/CAM crowns on dentin abutments. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(1):4755.​
  22. Peumans M, et al. Clinical performance of metalfree polymer crowns after 3 years in function. J Dent. 2005;33(8):699707.​
  23. Celik EU, et al. Thirtymonth randomized clinical evaluation of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite in posterior teeth. J Dent. 2011;39(8):62837.​
  24. Alrahlah A, et al. Evaluating the effect of nanofilled composite restorations on marginal adaptation and wear in posterior teeth: a clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024;25(2):2107.​
  25. Padovani GC, et al. The implications and applications of nanotechnology in dentistry: a review.
    J Dent. 2015;43(8):87180.​
  26. Sailer I, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconiaceramic and metalceramic posterior threeunit fixed dental prostheses: 3year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(6):55360