Development of an Automated Load-Controlled Thermopower Measurement Technique for Thermoelectric Materials

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Year 2026 | Subscription
International Journal of Mechanics and Design
Received Date: 02/23/2026
Acceptance Date: 02/27/2026
Published On: 2026-03-10
First Page:
Last Page:

Journal Menu


By: Anish Kumar.

Department of Mechanical engineering, BIT, Sindri, Jharkhand, India.

Abstract

The Seebeck coefficient, or thermoelectric power, is crucial. In order to deliver accurate readings over a wide temperature range, a load-based, high-precision thermoelectric power (TEP) measurement device has been designed, constructed, and experimentally validated in this study. The system is based on a differential DC approach and replaces conventional spring-based contact mechanisms with a shifting mechanical load to avoid errors caused by spring contraction, thermal cycling, and contact instability at low temperatures. The instrument can measure small samples, such as wires, thin films, and bulk pellets, with great reproducibility and is integrated with an automated data gathering system. Thermoelectric measurements are supported by extensive structural, spectroscopic, microscopic, and transport characterisation methods. such as X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, and studies of electrical and thermal transport. The accuracy and performance of the developed setup are verified using high-purity platinum samples, whose measured thermopower values show excellent agreement with data published in the literature. In the temperature range of around 5 K to 330 K, the system shows steady working with low uncertainty and short measurement durations. An intuitive, accurate, and efficient experimental platform for investigating the thermoelectric properties of novel materials—particularly low-dimensional and nanostructured systems—is provided by the developed load-based TEP setup.

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Anish Kumar Development of an Automated Load-Controlled Thermopower Measurement Technique for Thermoelectric Materials. International Journal of Mechanics and Design. 2026; 12(1): -p.

How to cite this URL: Anish Kumar, Development of an Automated Load-Controlled Thermopower Measurement Technique for Thermoelectric Materials. International Journal of Mechanics and Design. 2026; 12(1): -p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijmd/article=26017

Refrences:

  1. W. Ashcroft and D. N. Mermin, Solid State Physics. Indian Reprint (2017).
  2. Tarachand, Hussain, N. P. Lalla, Y.-K. Kuo, A. Lakhani, V. G. Sathe. U. Deshpandea and G. S. Okram, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 5926 (2018).
  3. Tarachand, et , ACS Appl. Energy Mater. (2019). {DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01016}J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Physica B 192, 55 (1993); H. M. Rietveld, Acta Cryst. 22, 151 (1967); H. M. Rietveld, J. Applied Cryst. 2, 65 (1969).
  4. Momma and F. Izumi, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  5. Tarachand, Saxena, B. Mukherjee, G. S. Okram, Rev.Sci.Instrum.90, 63904 (2019).
  6. Soni and G. S. Okram, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 125103 (2008).
  7. S. Lue, Y.-K. Kuo, C. L. Huang, and W. J. Lai, Phys. Rev. B 69, 125111 (2004).
  8. Gahtori, R. Lal, S.K. Agarwal, M. A. H. Ahsan, A. Rao, Y. F. Lin, K. M. Sivakumar, Y-K. Kuo, J. Phys.: Condens Matter 19, 256212 (2007).
  9. P. Heremans, V. Jovovic, E. S. Toberer, A. Saramat, K. Kurosaki, A. Charoenphakdee, S. Yamanaka and G. J. Snyder, Science 321, 554 (2008).
  10. S. S. Chandra, A. Lakhani, D. Jain, S. Pandya, P. N. Vishwakarma, M. Gangrade
  11. Mun, S. L. Bud’ko, M. S Torikachvili and P. C. Canfield, Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 055104 (2010).
  12. T. Burkov, A. Heinrich, P. P. Konstantinov, T. Nakama and K. Yagasaki, Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 264 (2001).
  13. Abadlia, F. Gasser, K. Khalouk, M. Mayoufi and J. G. Gasser, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 095121 (2014).
  14. S. Tripathi, M. Bala, and K. Asokan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 085115 (2014).
  15. P. Huesener, Phys. Rev. 140, A1834 (1965).
  16. S. Tripathi and M. Karppinen, Meas. Sci. Technol. 30, 025602 (2019).
  17. Cusack and P. Kendall, Proc. Phys. Soc. 72, 898 (1958).
  18. B. Roberts, Phil. Mag. 43, 1125 (1981). J. P. Moore and R. S. Graves, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 1174 (1973).