Egg Size Dynamics in Laying Hens: Implications for Physiological, Nutritional, and Managemental Interventions

Volume: 11 | Issue: 02 | Year 2025 | Subscription
International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications
Received Date: 03/05/2025
Acceptance Date: 05/21/2025
Published On: 2025-08-27
First Page: 1
Last Page: 19

Journal Menu

By: Md.Emran Hossain

1Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Abstract

This review explores the factors influencing egg size variability in laying hens, emphasizing the intricate interplay between physiological, nutritional, and management aspects. Egg size is a crucial trait affecting both production efficiency and market value in poultry farming. The review discusses how genetic predispositions and physiological traits, such as the age of the hen and body condition, contribute to egg size. Additionally, nutritional factors, including protein content, energy levels, and mineral balance, are examined for their roles in optimizing egg production. Management practices, such as housing conditions, feeding regimens, and health monitoring, are also highlighted for their significant impact on egg size. By synthesizing current research, this review aims to provide insights into how these interrelated factors shape egg size variability, offering practical recommendations for poultry producers to enhance egg production strategies while ensuring optimal health and welfare of the hens. The findings underscore the necessity for a holistic approach in managing laying hens to achieve consistent and desirable egg size in commercial production settings

Keywords : Egg size, genetics, laying hens, management strategies, nutrition, physiology, productivity, reproductive performance

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Md.Emran Hossain, Egg Size Dynamics in Laying Hens: Implications for Physiological, Nutritional, and Managemental Interventions. International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications. 2025; 11(02): 1-19p.

How to cite this URL: Md.Emran Hossain, Egg Size Dynamics in Laying Hens: Implications for Physiological, Nutritional, and Managemental Interventions. International Journal of Animal Biotechnology and Applications. 2025; 11(02): 1-19p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijaba/article=20226

Refrences:

  1. Travel A, Nys Y, Lopes E. Physiological and environmental factors affecting egg quality. Prod Anim. 2010;23(2).
  2. Islam MS, Dutta RK. Morphometric analysis of indigenous, exotic and crossbred chickens (Gallus domesticus L.) in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. J Bio-Sci. 2010;18(1):94–8. doi:10.3329/jbs.v18i0.8782.
  3. Wilson HR. Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1991;47(1):5–20. doi:10.1079/WPS19910002.
  4. Robert JR. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J Poult Sci. 2004;41(3):161–77. doi:10.2141/jpsa.41.161.
  5. Sosnówka-Czajka E, Herbut E, Skomorucha I. Effect of different housing systems on productivity and welfare of laying hens. Ann Anim Sci. 2010;10(4):349–60.
  6. Holt PS, Davies RH, Dewulf J, Gast RK, Huwe JK, Jones DR, et al. The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poult Sci. 2011;90(1):251–62. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00794.
  7. Campbell DLM, De Haas EN, Lee C. A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development. Poult Sci. 2019;98(1):9–28. doi:10.3382/ps/pey319.
  8. Hanusova E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A, Oravcova M. Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotech Zootech. 2015;18(1):12–24. doi:10.15414/afz.2015.18.01.12-24.
  9. Hagan J, Adjei I, Baah A. Effects of extended period of storage and strain of layer on quality of chicken eggs. J Sci Technol. 2013;33(2):1. doi:10.4314/just.v33i2.1.
  10. Poultry development. 2013.
  11. Lerner IM, Cruden D. The heritability of egg weight: the advantages of mass selection and of early measurements. Poult Sci. 1951;30(1):34–41. doi:10.3382/ps.0300034.
  12. Preisinger R. Innovative layer genetics to handle global challenges in egg production. Br Poult Sci. 2018;59(1):1–6. doi:10.1080/00071668.2018.1401828.
  13. Tongsiri S, Jeyaruban GM, Hermesch S, van der Werf JHJ, Li L, Chormai T. Genetic parameters and inbreeding effects for production traits of Thai native chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019;32(7):930–8. doi:10.5713/ajas.18.0690.
  14. Isa AM, Kim WK, Ahmed ST, Yahya M, Awad EA, Hossain MM, et al. Hybrids generated by crossing elite laying chickens exhibited heterosis for clutch and egg quality traits. Poult Sci. 2020;99(12):6332–40. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.056.
  15. Kim CH, Kang HK. Effects of energy and protein levels on laying performance, egg quality, blood parameters, blood biochemistry, and apparent total tract digestibility on laying hens in an aviary system. Animals. 2022;12(24). doi:10.3390/ani12243513.
  16. Cufadar Y, Olgun O, Yildiz AÖ. The effect of dietary calcium concentration and particle size on performance, eggshell quality, bone mechanical properties and tibia mineral contents in moulted laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52(6):761–8. doi:10.1080/00071668.2011.641502.
  17. Petersen CF. Factors influencing egg shell quality—a review. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1965;21(2):110–38.
  18. Ousterhout LE. Effects of calcium and phosphorus levels on egg weight and egg shell quality in laying hens. Poult Sci. 1980;59(7):1480–4. doi:10.3382/ps.0591480.
  19. Nie W, Wang B, Gao J, Guo Y, Wang Z. Effects of dietary phosphorous supplementation on laying performance, egg quality, bone health and immune responses of laying hens challenged with Escherichia coli J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s40104-018-0271-z.
  20. Plaimast H, Kijparkorn S, Ittitanawong P. Effects of vitamin D3 and calcium on productive performance, egg quality and vitamin D3 content in egg of second production cycle hens. Thai J Vet Med. 2015;45(2):189–95. doi:10.56808/2985-1130.2635.
  21. March BE, Biely J. Control of egg size in chickens through dietary amino-acid balance. Nature. 1963;200(4907):702–3. doi:10.1038/200702b0.
  22. Lee JT, Rochell SJ, Kriseldi R, Kim WK, Mitchell RD. Functional properties of amino acids: improve health status and sustainability. Poult Sci. 2023;102(1):102288. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2022.102288.
  23. Grobas S, Mateos GG, Mendez J. Influence of dietary linoleic acid on production and weight of eggs and egg components in young brown hens. J Appl Poult Res. 1999;8(2):177–84. doi:10.1093/japr/8.2.177.
  24. Elnesr SS, Elwan H, Elwan ER, Elkomy A, Mohamed WA. Trace minerals in laying hen diets and their effects on egg quality. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2024;202(12):5664–79. doi:10.1007/s12011-024-04121-8.
  25. Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR, Tiwari R, Karthik K, Dhama K. Nutritional significance of amino acids, vitamins and minerals as nutraceuticals in poultry production and health–A comprehensive review. Vet Q. 2020;41(1):1–29. doi:10.1080/01652176.2020.1857887.
  26. Ege G, Bozkurt M, Koçer B, Tüzün AE, Uygun M, Alkan G. Influence of feed particle size and feed form on productive performance, egg quality, gastrointestinal tract traits, digestive enzymes, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of laying hens reared in enriched cages. Poult Sci. 2019;98(9):3787–801. doi:10.3382/ps/pez082.
  27. Lorenz FW, Almquist HJ. Seasonal variations in egg quality. Poult Sci. 1936;15(1):14–8. doi:10.3382/ps.0150014.
  28. Oguntunji AO, Alabi OM. Influence of high environmental temperature on egg production and shell quality: A review. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2010;66(4):739–50. doi:10.1017/S004393391000070X.
  29. Chukwuka OK, Okoli IC, Okeudo NJ, Ogbuewu IP, Aladi NO, Iheshiulor GOO, et al. Egg quality defects in poultry management and food safety. Asian J Agric Res. 2011;5(1):1–16. doi:10.3923/ajar.2011.1.16.
  30. Bédécarrats GY, Hanlon C. Effect of lighting and photoperiod on chicken egg production and quality. In: Sauveur B, editor. Poultry development. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2017. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800879-9.00007-X.
  31. Geng AL, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang HH, Chu Q, Liu HG. Effects of lighting pattern and photoperiod on egg production and egg quality of a native chicken under free-range condition. Poult Sci. 2018;97(7):2378–84. doi:10.3382/ps/pey104.
  32. Gerzilov V, Datkova V, Mihaylova S, Bozakova N. Effect of poultry housing systems on egg production. Bulg J Agric Sci. 2012;18(6):953–7.
  33. Cronin GM, Barnett TLJ, Hemsworth PH. The importance of pre-laying behaviour and nest boxes for laying hen welfare: A review. Anim Prod Sci. 2012;52(7):398–405. doi:10.1071/AN11258.
  34. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, Lund V, Moe RO. Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part II—Ammonia. Animals. 2015;5(3):886–96.
  35. Li D, et al. Effects of cold stress and ammonia concentration on productive performance and egg quality traits of laying hens. Animals. 2020;10(12):2252.
  36. Kilic I, Simsek E. The effects of heat stress on egg production and quality of laying hens. J Anim Vet Adv. 2013;12(1):42–7. doi:10.3923/javaa.2013.42.47.
  37. Geng AL, et al. Effects of indoor stocking density on performance, egg quality, and welfare status of a native chicken during 22 to 38 weeks. Poult Sci. 2020;99(1):163–71. doi:10.3382/ps/pez543.
  38. Guesdon V, Ahmed AMH, Mallet S, Faure JM, Nys Y. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality. Br Poult Sci. 2006;47(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/00071660500468124.
  39. Glatz PC. Effect of age of beak trimming on the production performance of hens. Aust J Exp Agric. 1990;30(3):349–55. doi:10.1071/EA9900349.
  40. Mishra R, Mishra B, Kim YS, Jha R. Practices and issues of moulting programs for laying hens: a review. Br Poult Sci. 2022;63(5):720–9. doi:10.1080/00071668.2022.2059339.
  41. Wang P, et al. Effect of induced molting on ovarian function remodeling in laying hens. Poult Sci. 2023;102(8):102820. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2023.102820.
  42. Bryden WL, Li X, Ruhnke I, Zhang D, Shini S. Nutrition, feeding and laying hen welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2021;61(10):893–914. doi:10.1071/AN20396.
  43. Summers JD, Leeson S. Effect of water deprivation on egg production and egg quality. Poult Sci. 1976;55(1):441–4.
  44. Mirwandhono RE, Miranti A, Sari TV, Aulia FD. The Effect of Biosecurity Implementation on Mortality in Layer Chicken Farming. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1286:012004. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1286/1/012004.
  45. Shi L, et al. Effect of age at photostimulation on sexual maturation and egg-laying performance of layer breeders. Poult Sci. 2020;99(2):812–9. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.027.
  46. Abbas SA, Gasm Elseid AA, Ahmed MKA. Effect of body weight uniformity on the productivity of broiler breeder hens. Int J Poult Sci. 2010;9(3):225–30. doi:10.3923/ijps.2010.225.230.
  47. Travel A, Nys Y, Bain M. Effect of hen age, moult, laying environment and egg storage on egg quality. In: Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg Products: Egg Chemistry, Production and Consumption. Elsevier; 2011. pp. 300–29. doi:10.1533/9780857093912.3.300.
  48. Tůmova E, Gous RM. Interaction of hen production type, age, and temperature on laying pattern and egg quality. Poult Sci. 2012;91(5):1269–75. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01951.
  49. Singh AK, Krupa S, Bhattacharjee M. Poultry Health Management Practices and Their Effect on Production and Reproduction. Rev Electron Vet. 2023;24(2):486–500.
  50. Sah N, Mishra B. Regulation of egg formation in the oviduct of laying hen. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2018;74(3):509–22. doi:10.1017/S0043933918000442.
  51. Regmi P, Robison CI, Jones DR, Gast RK, Tempelman RJ, Karcher DM. Effects of different litter substrates and induced molt on production performance and welfare quality parameters of white Leghorn hens housed in multi-tiered aviary system. Poult Sci. 2018;97(10):3397–404. doi:10.3382/ps/pey211.
  52. England A, Ruhnke I. The influence of light of different wavelengths on laying hen production and egg quality. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2020;76(3):443–58. doi:10.1080/00439339.2020.1789023.
  53. Kabir SML, Sikder MH, Alam J, Neogi SB, Yamasaki S. Colibacillosis and its impact on egg production. In: Poultry Diseases. Elsevier Inc.; 2017. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800879-9.00049-4.
  54. Akhtar T, et al. Pathology of parasitic infections. In: Parasitism and Parasitic Control in Animals: Strategies for the Developing World. CABI GB; 2023. p. 21–39. doi:10.1079/9781800621893.0002.
  55. Marangon S, Busani L. The use of vaccination in poultry production. OIE Rev Sci Tech. 2007;26(1):265–74. doi:10.20506/rst.26.1.1742.
  56. Alfonso-Carrillo C, Benavides-Reyes C, de los Mozos J, Dominguez-Gasca N. Relationship between bone quality, egg production and welfare. Animals. 2021;11:623.
  57. Shang H, et al. Inulin improves the egg production performance and affects the cecum microbiota of laying hens. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;155:1599–609.
  58. Wang Y, et al. Characteristics of the fecal microbiota of high-and low-yield hens and effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on egg production performance. Res Vet Sci. 2020;129:164–73.
  59. Murugesan GR, et al. Prevalence and effects of mycotoxins on poultry health and performance, and recent development in mycotoxin counteracting strategies. Poult Sci. 2015;94(6):1298–315. doi:10.3382/ps/pev075.
  60. Roberts JR, Souillard R, Bertin J. Avian diseases which affect egg production and quality. In: Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg Products: Egg Chemistry, Production and Consumption. Elsevier; 2011. pp. 376–93. doi:10.1533/9780857093912.3.376.
  61. Nii T. Relationship between mucosal barrier function of the oviduct and intestine in the productivity of laying hens. J Poult Sci. 2022;59(2):105–13. doi:10.2141/jpsa.0210090.
  62. Galea F. Nutrition and food management and their influence on egg quality. In: XLVIII Simposio Científico De Avicultura; 2011. p. 6.
  63. Nehra D, Le HD, Fallon EM, Carlson SJ, Woods D, White YA, et al. Prolonging the female reproductive lifespan and improving egg quality with dietary omega‐3 fatty acids. Aging Cell. 2012;11(6):1046–54.
  64. Dunn-Horrocks S, O’Bryan CA, Ricke SC, Slavik MF. Effect of omega-3 enriched layer rations on egg quality. Int J Poult Sci. 2011;10(1):8–11.
  65. Benabdeljelil K, Arbaoui MI. Effects of enzyme supplementation of barley-based diets on hen performance and egg quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994;48(3–4):325–34. doi:10.1016/0377-8401(94)90181-3.
  66. Hayat Z, Cherian G, Pasha TN, Khattak FM, Jabbar MA. Effect of feeding flax and two types of antioxidants on egg production, egg quality, and lipid composition of eggs. J Appl Poult Res. 2009;18(3):541–51. doi:10.3382/japr.2009-00008.
  67. Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME. The effect of rosemary herb as a dietary supplement on performance, egg quality, serum biochemical parameters, and oxidative status in laying hens. J Anim Feed Sci. 2015;24(4):341–7. doi:10.22358/jafs/65617/2015.
  68. Soltan MA. Effect of dietary organic acid supplementation on egg production, egg quality and some blood serum parameters in laying hens. Int J Poult Sci. 2008;7(6):613–21.
  69. Manafi M, Murthy HNN, Noor Ali M, Narayana Swamy HD. Evaluation of different mycotoxin binders on broiler breeders induced with aflatoxin B1: Effects on egg quality parameters. World Appl Sci J. 2012;17(3):271–7.
  70. Hammershøj M, Kjaer JB. Phase feeding for laying hens: Effect of protein and essential amino acids on egg quality and production. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 1999;49(1):31–41. doi:10.1080/090647099421513.
  71. Carvalho RR, Palme R, da Silva Vasconcellos A. An integrated analysis of social stress in laying hens: The interaction between physiology, behaviour, and hierarchy. Behav Processes. 2018;149:43–51. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.016.
  72. Wang XJ, Liu L, Zhao JP, Jiao HC, Lin H. Stress impairs the reproduction of laying hens: An involvement of energy. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2017;73(4):845–55. doi:10.1017/S0043933917000794.
  73. Oliveira J, Zhao Y, Li L, Liu K, Glaess K, Xin H. Nesting behavior and egg production pattern of laying hens in enriched colony housing. In: 2016 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2016. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; 2016. p. 1. doi:10.13031/aim.20162456546.
  74. Konkol D, Popiela E, Korczyński M. The effect of an enriched laying environment on welfare, performance, and egg quality parameters of laying hens kept in a cage system. Poult Sci. 2020;99(8):3771–6. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.017.
  75. Lay DC, Fulton RM, Hester PY, Karcher DM, Kjaer JB, Mench JA, et al. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult Sci. 2011;90(1):278–94. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00962.
  76. Bist RB, Sahu SK, Sahoo G, Pradhan CR, Behura NC, Nayak G, et al. Effects of perching on poultry welfare and production: A review. Poultry. 2023;2(2):134–57. doi:10.3390/poultry2020013.
  77. O’Connor EA, Parker M, Lambton SL, Nicol CJ, Weeks CA. Effect of low light and high noise on behavioural activity, physiological indicators of stress and production in laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52(6):666–74. doi:10.1080/00071668.2011.639342.
  78. Warren DC, Scott HM. The time factor in egg formation. Poult Sci. 1935;14(4):195–207.
  79. El-Sabrout K, Aggag S, Mishra B. Advanced practical strategies to enhance table egg production. Scientifica (Cairo). 2022;2022(1):1393392. doi:10.1155/2022/1393392.
  80. Bain MM, Nys Y, Dunn IC. Increasing persistency in lay and stabilising egg quality in longer laying cycles. What are the challenges? Br Poult Sci. 2016;57(3):330–8. doi:10.1080/00071668.2016.1161727.
  81. Şahan U, Ipek A, Sozcu A. Yolk sac fatty acid composition, yolk absorption, embryo development, and chick quality during incubation in eggs from young and old broiler breeders. Poult Sci. 2014;93(8):2069–77. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03850.
  82. Salamon A. Factors affecting the production of double-yolked eggs. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2020;76(4):815–26.
  83. Waddington D, Perry MM, Gilbert AB, Hardie MA. Follicular growth and atresia in the ovaries of hens (Gallus domesticus) with diminished egg production rates. Reproduction. 1985;74(2):399–405.
  84. Kim HR, Ryu C, Lee SD, Cho JH, Kang H. Effects of heat stress on the laying performance, egg quality, and physiological response of laying hens. Animals. 2024;14(7):1–12. doi:10.3390/ani14071076.
  85. Chuskit D, Swati. An overview of chicken reproductive performance and its challenges at high-altitude of Leh-Ladakh region: Review. Acta Sci Vet Sci. 2023;(June):71–9. doi:10.31080/asvs.2023.05.0675.

 Previous Article
Next Article