This research explores the optimization of Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) formulations by investigating the mix proportions of fly ash, fine aggregate, and coarse aggregate. The study focuses on enhancing early strength properties and delves into the complex geopolymerization mechanism, unraveling the unique contributions of each constituent material. Additionally, the research systematically evaluates the strength characteristics of GPC incorporating Fly Ash (FA) and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS), providing insights into its mechanical behavior. The influence of various curing conditions on GPC performance is thoroughly analyzed, offering valuable considerations for optimizing the curing process. Through these objectives, the study aims to contribute to the understanding and improvement of GPC, shedding light on its potential applications in sustainable construction practices.

1. Abdullah MMA, Hussin K, Bnhussain M, Ismail KN, Ibrahim WMW. Mechanism and Chemical Reaction of Fly Ash Geopolymer Cement - A Review. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2011;5(2):35-44. 2. Abhilash P, Sashidhar C, Reddy IVR. Strength properties of Fly ash and GGBS based Geopolymer Concrete. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2016;9(3):350-356. 3. Bisarya A, Chouhan RK, Mudgal MM, Amritphale SS. Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete - a New Technology towards the Greener Environment: A Review. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2015;4(12). 4. Ayachit AC, Nikam PB, Pise SN. Mix Design of fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Int J Sci Res Publications. 2016;6(2). 5. Immelman DW. The influence of percentage replacement on the aggregate and concrete properties from commercially produced coarse recycled concrete aggregate [research work]. University of Stellenbosch. 2013. 6. Hardjito D, Steenie EW, Wallah D, Sumajouw MJ, Rangan BV. Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Civil Engineering Dimension. 2004;6(2):88–93. 7. Elawady E, Hefnawy AE, Ibrahim RAF. Comparative Study on Strength, Permeability and Sorptivity of Concrete and their relation with Concrete Durability. Int J Eng Innov Technol. 2014;4(4). 8. Cook G. Climate change and the cement Industry: Assessing emissions and policy responses to carbon prices. Carbon Counts Ltd. 2009. 9. Madhan GK, Kiran B, Naga. Investigation on Behaviour of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete in Acidic Environment. Int J Modern Eng Res. 2013;3(1):580-586. 10. Pitroda J, Umrigar FS. Evaluation of Sorptivity and Water Absorption of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Thermal Industry Waste (Fly Ash). Int J Eng Innov Technol. 2013;2(7). 11. Joshi SV, Kadu MS. Role of Alkaline Activator in Development of Eco-friendly Fly Ash Based GeoPolymer Concrete. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2012;3(5). 12. Liu J, Xing F, Dong B, Ma H, Pan D. Study on water sorptivity of the surface layer of concrete. Materials and Structures. 2014;47:1941–1951. DOI:10.1617/s11527-013-0162-x. 13. Ng KH, Tam CM, Tam VWY. Deformation and Sorptivity of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced by Two Stage Mixing Approach. Surveying and Built Environment. 2006;17(1):7-14. 14. Kumaravel S, Girija K. Acid and salt resistance of Geopolymer concrete with varying concentration of NaOH. J Eng Res Stud. 2013. 15. Kumaravel S, Thirugnanasambandam S. Flexural behaviour of geopolymer concrete beams. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud. 2013;1. 16. Kupwade K, Patel, Allouche E. Effect of Alkali Silica Reaction in Geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the World Coal Ash Conference; 2011. 17. Madheswaran CK, Gnanasundar G, Gopalakrishnan N. Effect of molarity in geopolymer concrete. Int J Civ Struct Eng. 2013;4(2). 18. Madheswaran CK, Ambily PS, Rajamane NP, Arun G. Studies on flexural behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with lightweight aggregates. Int J Civ Struct Eng. 2014;4(3). 19. Madheswaran CK, Ambily PS, Dattatreya JK, Ramesh G. Experimental Studies on Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams subjected to Monotonic Static Loading. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2014;3(7). 20. Parekh DN, Modhera CD. Assessment of recycled aggregate concrete. J Eng Res Stud. 2011. 21. Parthiban K, Saravanarajamohan K, Shobana S, Bhaskar A. Effect of Replacement of Slag on the Mechanical Properties of Flyash Based Geopolymer Concrete. Int J Eng Technol. 2013;5(3). 22. Prachasaree W, Limkatanyu S, Hawa A. Development of equivalent stress block parameters for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Arab J Sci Eng. 2014. 23. Mondal P, Radhakrishna, Sasalatti V, Venugopal K. Properties of Alkali Activated Cement Mortar and Concrete and with Cent -percent Replacement of Ingredients. J Civ Eng Technol Res. 2014;2(1):119-128. 24. Rajamane NP, Nataraja MC, Lakshmanan N, Ambily PS. Literature Survey on Geopolymer Concretes and a Research Plan in Indian Context. SRM University. 2012. 25. Rajesh A, Samanta AK, Roy DK, Singha. Characterization and development of eco-friendly concrete using industrial waste – a review. J Urban Environ Eng. 2014;8(1):98-108. 26. Thakur RN, Ghosh S. Effect of mix composition on compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer composites. Asian Research Publishing Network. 2009. 27. Tabassum RK, Khadwal A. A Brief Review on Geopolymer Concrete. Int J Adv Res Edu Technol. 2015;2(3). 28. Ruby A, Raj SD, Varghese A. Strength and behaviour of Geopolymer concrete beams. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2013;2(1). 29. Salmabanu L, Urvashi K. Durability Studies of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2015;5(8):17-32. 30. Salmabanu L, Urvashi. A Study on Water Absorption and Sorptivity of Geopolymer Concrete. Int J Civ Eng. 2015;2(8). 31. Sangeetha SP, Joanna PS. Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Partial Replacement of GGBS. Am J Eng Res. 2014;3(1):119-127. 32. Saravanakumar P, Dhinakaran G. Mechanical and durability properties of slag based recycled aggregate concrete. IJST Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2015;39(C2):271-282. 33. Thokchom PG, Ghosh S. Effect of water absorption, porosity and sorptivity on durability of geopolymer mortars. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2009;4(7).