Journal Menu
By: Shaikh Saaquib, Vaibhav Ramanboinwar, Abhishek Jadhav, and Ganesh Avtade
1Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Parvatibai. Genba. Moze. College of Engineering, Wgholi, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Abstract
Concrete is a critical material in civil engineering, valued for its strength and durability. However, the increasing demand for concrete, driven by rapid urbanization, has raised environmental concerns.
Cement, a primary component of concrete, is a significant source of carbon dioxide emissions during
its production, contributing to climate change and environmental degradation. This study investigates
a sustainable alternative to traditional cement by partially replacing it with Ground Granulated Blast
Furnace Slag (GGBS), an industrial by-product with similar cementitious properties. Utilizing GGBS not only helps in reducing the environmental footprint of concrete production but also offers a cost-
effective solution to construction practices. As a by-product of iron manufacturing, GGBS provides an eco-friendly means of recycling industrial waste into construction materials. The research examines the
impact of replacing cement with GGBS at levels of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by weight on the
compressive strength of M25 grade concrete. Concrete specimens were tested at curing periods of 7, 14,
21, and 28 days to evaluate their strength characteristics. The results indicate that replacing cement
with 10% GGBS achieves compressive strength comparable to traditional concrete. However, as the
percentage of GGBS increases beyond 20%, there is a noticeable decline in strength, particularly at
30% and 40% replacement levels. This study demonstrates that GGBS can be effectively used as a
partial cement replacement at an optimal level of 10%, offering environmental benefits without
compromising concrete performance. Adopting GGBS in construction practices can contribute to
reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable development within the construction industry.
This research highlights the potential of integrating industrial by-products into concrete mixtures to
achieve a balance between environmental sustainability and structural efficiency.
Citation:
Refrences:
1. Patil Y, Patil PN, Dwiwedi A. Experimental study on GGBS as partial replacement of OPC in
cement concrete. Int J Sci Res. 2013;2(11):1–5.
2. Pratap KV, Bhasker M, Teja PSS. Triple blending of cement concrete with fly ash and ground
granulated blast furnace slag. Int J Eng Adv Res. 2014;4(Spl-2):1–7.
3. UCD School of Architecture, Landscape and Civil Engineering. Use of GGBS concrete mixes for
aggressive infrastructural applications. Enterprise Ireland Ecocem Ireland Innovation Partnership
Program; 2008.
4. Pavia S, Condren E. Durability of OPC versus GGBS concrete on exposure to silage effluent. J
Mater Civ Eng. 2008;20(4):313–320.
5. Narde R, Gadpalliwar SK, Deotale RS, Abhijeet. Partial replacement of cement by GGBS & RHA
and natural sand by quarry sand in concrete. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng. 2014;11(2):1–8.
6. Zerdi TA, Athar SM. Suitability & performance of concrete with the addition of GGBS as partial
replacement of cement. Int J Civ Eng Res. 2015;3(1):1–4.
7. Suresh D, Nagaraju K. Ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) in concrete: A review. IOSR J Mech
Civ Eng. 2015;12(4):76–82.
8. Malhotra R, Mehta V. High-performance concrete incorporating GGBS. Int J Civ Eng Res.
2015;6(4):1–7.
9. Kumar A, Singh M. Effect of GGBS on the compressive strength of concrete. J Struct Eng.
2016;41(2):1–5.
10. Reddy T, Sharma L, Prasad K. Sustainable concrete using GGBS: Durability and strength
analysis. Constr Build Mater. 2018;102(1):1–7.
11. Wu J, Li Y, Zhang H. The influence of GGBS on the microstructure and performance of concrete.
Mater Sci Forum. 2019;927:13–20.
12. Verma P, Gupta AK. Role of GGBS in enhancing the sustainability of concrete. Sustain Struct
Mater. 2020;9(3):1–5.
13. Jain S, Tiwari R. Life cycle assessment of concrete containing GGBS. J Clean Prod.
2020;253:120003.
14. Patel H, Shah M, Patel V. Optimizing GGBS usage in cementitious systems. Cem Concr Res.
2021;131:106019.
15. Kumar D, Sharma S, Mishra P. Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete
with GGBS. Adv Constr Concr. 2022;12(3):1–8.
16. Mishra LN, Banerjee R. The application of GGBS in green concrete: A review. J Green Build
Mater Appl. 2022;5(2):1–7.
17. Tamilarasan VS. Workability studies on concrete with GGBS as a replacement material for
cement with and without superplasticiser. Int J Adv Res Eng Technol. 2012;3(2):11–21.
18. Balamurugan G. Behaviour of concrete on the use of Quarry dust to replace sand – An
experimental study. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2013;3(6):776–781.
19. Patel M. Experimental investigation on strength of high performance concrete with GGBS and
crusher sand. Indian J Res. 2013;3(4):115–116.20. Arivalagan S. Sustainable studies on concrete with GGBS as a replacement material in cement. Jordan J Civ Eng. 2014;8(3):263–270.
21. Gurunaathan K, Thirugnanam GS. Effect of mineral admixtures on durability properties of
concrete. Int J Adv Struct Geotech Eng, 2014;3(1):65–68.
22. Yang K-H, Jeon Y-S. Feasibility tests on concrete with very- high-volume supplementary
cementitious materials. Hindawi Publishing Corporation the Scientific World Journal; 2014. pp.
1–11.
