By: Raju Ramrao Kulkarni and Shweta Kulkarni
1Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Shri Shivji Institute of Engineering & Management Studies, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India
2PG Student, Civil Engineering Department, Shri Shivji Institute of Engineering & Management Studies,
Maharashtra, Parbhani, India
Abstract
This paper delves into recent advances in geotechnical engineering, with a primary focus on
innovative techniques for ground improvement, soil stabilization, and risk mitigation, all within the
context of sustainable infrastructure development. Geotechnical engineering is a key branch of civil
engineering that deals with the complexities of soil-structure interactions and the challenges posed by
diverse ground conditions. As the demand for resilient and eco-friendly infrastructure rises,
geotechnical engineering is undergoing a significant transformation, spurred by technological
innovations and an increasing emphasis on sustainability. Traditional ground improvement
techniques, such as compaction and chemical stabilization, have been augmented by newer, more
environmentally friendly methods, including bioengineering approaches like microbial-induced
calcite precipitation (MICP) and polymer-based soil stabilizers. In addition, advances in deep mixing
methods and the use of geosynthetics – such as geotextiles, geogrids, and geocells – are
revolutionizing soil reinforcement and stabilization, enhancing the durability of civil structures while
minimizing environmental impacts. The paper also highlights the growing role of monitoring
technologies and numerical modeling in geotechnical engineering. Tools, such as remote sensing,
ground-based radar, and wireless sensor networks allow for real-time monitoring of geohazards,
such as landslides, soil liquefaction, and seismic-induced failures, while advanced numerical models
enable more precise predictions of soil behavior under various load conditions. Through a
comprehensive review of these cutting-edge techniques, this paper demonstrates how modern
geotechnical engineering is well-positioned to tackle critical challenges posed by climate change and
urbanization. The integration of innovative, sustainable solutions in geotechnical practices is paving
the way for safer, more resilient, and environmentally friendly infrastructure, significantly
contributing to the global effort to mitigate the risks associated with natural disasters and
environmental degradation.
Citation:
Refrences:
1. Liu J, Zhang J, Sun J. Mechanical properties of cement-lime-stabilized soils.
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2018;144(6):04018040.
2. DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC. Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng.
2010;36(2):197–210.
3. Chang I, Im J, Cho G. Geotechnical engineering behavior of soil–polymer composites. Constr
Build Mater. 2016;102:372–383.
4. Bruce DA, Bruce RM. The design and application of deep mixing methods. In: Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Ground Improvement Technologies and Case Histories. 2012.
5. Liu L, Zhang Q, Zhang J. Fiber reinforcement in deep mixing columns: Numerical analysis.
Comput Geotech. 2017;83:194–207.
6. Koerner RM. Designing with geosynthetics. 6th ed. Xlibris Corporation; 2012.
7. Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M. Geosynthetics-reinforced soil retaining walls: Recent Japanese case
studies. Geosynth Int. 2013;20(2):271–285.
8. Michalowski RL, Zhao A. Bearing capacity of footings on slopes reinforced with geogrids.
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 1996;122(8):591–597.
9. Yildiz H, Sahin S. The use of geocells in geotechnical engineering applications. In: Proceedings
of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Ground Improvement. 2018;171(3):109–118.
10. Zornberg JG. Advances in the use of geosynthetics in the civil engineering industry. In:
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics. 2000.
11. Vieira CS, Pereira JM, Lopes ML. Geosynthetics in embankments on soft soils. In: Proceedings
of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Ground Improvement. 2015;168(1):15–29.
12. Schuster RL. Landslide mitigation. In: Landslide Hazard and Risk. Wiley; 2005.
13. Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough AG. Desirable root traits for protecting natural and engineered
slopes against landslides. Plant and Soil. 2009;324(1):1–30. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0159-y.
14. Strozzi T, Delaloye R, Raetzo H. Remote sensing technologies for monitoring landslides. In:
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Landslide Risk Mitigation. 2007.
15. Youd TL, Idriss IM. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and
1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng.
2001;127(10):817–833.
doi:
10.1061/(ASCE)1090
0241(2001)127:10(817.
16. Goh SH, Rahman Z. Gravel drains for liquefaction mitigation: A case study. Geotech Earthq Eng.
2013.
17. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals.
7th ed. Elsevier; 2013.
18. Brinkgreve RB, Engin EA, Swolfs WM. Plaxis 2D 2010. User Manual. Plaxis BV; 2010.
19. Zhang D, Zhu W. Machine learning techniques for soil behavior modeling in geotechnical
engineering. Adv Civ Eng. 2018;2018:15.
20. Mikkelsen PE. Advances in inclinometer data analysis. In: Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics. 2002.
21. Casagli N, Catani F, Puglisi C. Remote sensing and ground-based radar techniques for landslide
monitoring. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2010;10(1):187–202.
22. Intrieri E, Gigli G, Mugnai F. Landslide early warning systems: performance and reliability. In:
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Landslide Risk Mitigation. 2012.
23. Kim S, Lee H, Kwon O. Development of wireless sensor networks for monitoring slope failures.
In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering. 2014.
