By: Siakpere ., Priscilla Oyovwirhe, K.K. Dagde, and E.O. Ehirim
The study was done for the biosorption of hydrocarbon contaminated soil using chicken feather waste (CFW) and adsorbent pad adsorbents (AP). The adsorbents materials were sourced locally and prepared accordingly and made ready for the adsorption process. To analyze the adsorption of crude oil from contaminated soil, the following time intervals were used: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 15 weeks, and 20 weeks. Additionally, varying amounts of adsorbents – specifically, 1 g, 1.5 g, 2 g, 3.5 g, and 6 g of both pulverized CFW and PA – were sequentially introduced to the crude oil-contaminated soil in separate beakers. The adsorption [CD1] process was investigated for the various weeks and samples were collected weekly accordingly. It was observed during the experiment that absorbent pad (AP) and chicken feather waste (CFW) were good adsorbents for the adsorption of crude oil from the soil. Both adsorbents have strong affinity to uptake of pollutants from the soil. Adsorbents made from chicken feather waste (CFW) and adsorbent pad (AP) were used to test the power of adsorption of crude oil from the soil. The experimental results were subjected to the isotherms and kinetics models for evaluations and analysis. The results of the evaluations and analysis indicate that second order kinetic describes the adsorption for both adsorbents in crude oil contaminated soil since their coefficient of determination values were highest of ranges 0.5618–0.9935, and 0.959–0.996, respectively for 1 g–6 g masses of adsorbents compared to other kinetics. “To identify the adsorption isotherm model that most accurately represents the adsorption process”, we evaluated the Langmuir, Freundlich, Tempkin, and Elovich isotherms. Tempkin isotherm model was identified as the best fit isotherm.
Keywords: Chicken feather, biosorption analysis, crude oil, contaminated soil
Citation:
Refrences:
1. Aboki E, Aau J, Ji O. Productivity and technical efficiency of family poultry in Kurmi local government area of Taraba State, Nigeria. J Agric Sustain. 2017.
2. Adams GO, Fufeyin PT, Okoro SE, Ehinomen I. Biosorption, biostimulation and bioaugmentation: A review. Int J Environ Biosorption Biodegrad. 2015;3(1):28–39.
3. Adene DF, Oguntade AE. The structure and importance of the commercial and village based poultry industry in Nigeria. FAO; Rome, Italy; 2016.
4. African Economic Outlook. Promoting youth employment. A publication of AfDB; 2012.
5. Aghalibe CU, Igwe JC, Obike AI. Studies on the removal of petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs) from a crude oil impacted soil amended with cow dung, poultry manure and NPK fertilizer. Chem Res J. 2017;2(4):22–30.
6. Akuru UB, Okoro OI. A prediction on Nigeria’s oil depletion based on Hubbert’s model and the need for renewable energy. ISRN Renewable Energy. 2011:285–649.
7. Al.Auber MA. Thermodynamics approach in the absorption of heavy metals. London: Intech Open Access Publisher; 2011.
8. Alberda van Ekenstein GOR, Meyboom R, ten Brinke G, Ikkala O. Determination of the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter of styrene and 4-vinylpyridine using copolymer blends of poly-(styrene-co-4-vinylpyridine) and polystyrene. Macromolecules. 2005;33(10):3752–6.
9. Arroyo M, López-Manchado MA, Herrero B. Organo-montmorillonite as substitute of carbon black in natural rubber compounds. Polymer. 2018;44(8):2447–53.
10. Atagana HI. Compost biosorption of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil inoculated organic manure. Afr J Biotechnol. 2018;7(10):1516–25.
11. Atlas RM, Bartha R. Biosorption of petroleum in sea water at low temperatures. Can J Microbiol. 2003;18:1851–5.
12. Atlas RM. Petroleum biosorption and oil spill biosorption. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;31:178–82.
13. Atlas RM, Stoeckel DM, Faith SA, Minard-Smith A, Thorn JR, Benotti MJ. Oil biodegradation and oil-degrading microbial populations in marsh sediments impacted by oil from the Deepwater Horizon well blowout. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;49(14):8356–66.
14. Ayotamuno MJ, Kogbara RB, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD. Biosorption of a crude-oil polluted agricultural soil at Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Appl Energy. 2017;83(11):1249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.01.003.
15. Baggot J. Biodegradable lubricants. Symposium of Life Cycle Analysis and Eco-Assessment in the Oil Industry, November 1992, Institute of Petroleum, Shell International Petroleum Company Ltd, England.
16. Balouch A, Kolachi M, Talpur FN, Khan H, Bhanger MI. Sorption kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic modeling of defluoridation of groundwater using natural absorbents. Am J Chem. 2013;4:221–8.
17. Blanks RF, Prausnitz JM. Thermodynamics of polymer solubility in polar and nonpolar systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam. 2018;3(1):1–8.
18. Boujelben N, Bouhamed F, Eloyear Z, Bouzid J, Feki M. Removal of phosphates ions from aqueous solutions using MO2-coated sand and brick. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;52:2282–92.
19. Brazel CS, Peppas NA. Synthesis and characterization of thermo- and chemomechanically responsive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) hydrogels. Macromolecules. 2019;28(24):8016–20.
20. Buchholz F, Graham A. Modern superabsorbent polymer technology. New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.; 2018.
21. Bundy JG, Paton JI, Campbell CD. Microbial communities in different soil types do not converge after diesel contamination. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92:176–288.
22. Campbell MK. Bioquimica, 3rd Edition. Artes Médicas Sul-Sul/Biomed; 2006.
23. Carbon from artocarpus integer fruit processing waste and evaluation of its chemical, morphological and adsorption properties. J Clean Prod. 2017;141(1):989–99.
24. Chahine R, Benard P. Advances in cryogenic engineering. In: Kittel P, editor. Boston: Springer; 2018. p. 1257–64.
25. Kim SJ, Park SJ, Kim SI. Swelling behavior of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels composed of poly-(vinyl alcohol) and chitosan. React Funct Polym. 2016;55(1):53–59.
26. Kim S, Krajavahuk-Brown R, Kim JO, Chung J. Biosorption of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites by DNA diagnosis-based bioslurping technology. Sci Total Environ. 2016;497:250–59.
27. Lancashire RJ. Stability, chelation and the chelate effect.
28. Leung M. Biosorption: Techniques for cleaning up a mess. J Biotechnol. 2004;2:18–22.
29. Levinson AA. Introduction to exploration geochemistry. Illinois: Applied Publishing Ltd; 1980.
30. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Method 8015B Non halogenated organics using GC/FID. Washington, D.C, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2020.
