Performance Evaluation of Geopolymer Masonry Units Using Fly Ash and GGBFS: Dimensionality, Density, Water Absorption, and Compressive Strength Analysis

Volume: 10 | Issue: 02 | Year 2024 | Subscription
International Journal of Construction Engineering and Planning
Received Date: 10/19/2024
Acceptance Date: 10/23/2024
Published On: 2024-10-29
First Page: 26
Last Page: 32

Journal Menu

By: Singh Utsav Ramesh Chhaya and Harsh Rathore

1Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Sanjeev Agarwal Global Educational University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
2Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sanjeev Agarwal Global Educational University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Abstract

Abstract
This study investigates the production, properties, and performance of geopolymer masonry units,
utilizing Class F fly ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) as primary binders.
These binders were activated using an 8M alkaline solution, with the materials mixed alongside
manufactured sand (M-sand) as the fine aggregate. The binder-to-aggregate ratio was maintained at
1:1, while the alkaline solution-to-binder ratio was kept at 0.2. Various geopolymer masonry units,
including geopolymer bricks (GPB), solid blocks (GPSB), and hollow blocks (GPHB), were evaluated
for key performance parameters, such as dimensional accuracy, density, water absorption, and
compressive strength. The findings indicate that dimensional variations among the units remained
within the permissible limits as set by IS 1077:1992, with deviations ranging from 1 to 3 mm. Density
measurements revealed values between 1760 and 1810 kg/m³, which, although slightly lower than those
of conventional bricks, still fall within acceptable limits as per IS 2185:2008. Water absorption rates
were observed to range between 7.5% and 9.5%, staying within the standard thresholds. Compressive
strength tests demonstrated a significant improvement over time, with strength values reaching up to
25 MPa at 28 days, far exceeding the 3.5 MPa minimum required by IS 1077:1992. These results
underscore the potential of geopolymer masonry units as viable and sustainable alternatives to
conventional bricks, offering not only comparable mechanical properties but also reduced
environmental impact through the utilization of industrial by-products.
Keywords: Geopolymer bricks, fly ash, durability, SEM analysis, sustainable construction, masonry
units, alkaline solutions

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Singh Utsav Ramesh Chhaya and Harsh Rathore, Performance Evaluation of Geopolymer Masonry Units Using Fly Ash and GGBFS: Dimensionality, Density, Water Absorption, and Compressive Strength Analysis. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Planning. 2024; 10(02): 26-32p.

How to cite this URL: Singh Utsav Ramesh Chhaya and Harsh Rathore, Performance Evaluation of Geopolymer Masonry Units Using Fly Ash and GGBFS: Dimensionality, Density, Water Absorption, and Compressive Strength Analysis. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Planning. 2024; 10(02): 26-32p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/uncategorized/article=13795
Full Text

Refrences:

  1. Drysdale RG, Hamid AA. Masonry structure’s behavior and design. 3rd ed. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University; 2008.
  2. Vijay DM, Menon PA, Shahanas F. Environmental pollution from brick making operations and their effect on workers. Biomarkers. 2001;4(3):162–166.
  3. GCL’s Cement Trends. Climate change and the cement industry. GCL Environmental special issue, conference and forum; London: 2002.
  4. Davidovits J. Properties of geopolymer cements. In: Proceedings of Kiev State Technical University Conference. Kiev, Ukraine: 1994. pp. 131–149.
  5. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ACI116R1980 – Manual of Concrete Practice. Part 1. 1980.
  6. Hardjito D, Rangan BV. Development and properties of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research Report GC 2.2. Perth (AU): Curtin University of Technology; 2005.
  7. Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram BG. Effect of types of curing on the strength of geopolymer concrete. Int J Phys Sci. 2010;5(9):1419–1423.
  8. Topark-Ngarm P, Chindaprasirt P, Sata V. Setting time, strength and bond of high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. 2014;27(7):04014198. doi: 1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001157.
  9. Motorwala A, Shah V, Kammula R, Nannapaneni P, Raijiwala DB. Alkali activated fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng. 2013;3(1):50–65.
  10. Vaidya S, Diaz EI, Allouche EN. Experimental evaluation of self-cured geopolymer concrete for mass pour applications. In: World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference; 2011 May 9–12; Denver, Colorado.
  11. Radhakrishna, Shashishankar A, Udayashankar BC. Analysis and assessment of strength development in Class F fly ash-based compressed geopolymer blocks. Indian Concrete J. 2008;82(8):31–37.
  12. Chen C, Li Q, Shen L, Zhai J. Feasibility of manufacturing geopolymer bricks using circulating fluidized bed combustion bottom ash. Environ Technol. 2012;33(10-12):1313–1321. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.626797.
  13. Malhotra SK, Tehri SP. Development of bricks from granulated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater. 1995;10(3):191–193. doi: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00081-X.
  14. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 516:1959, reaffirmed 1999. Methods of tests for strengths of concrete. 2nd ed. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1999.
  15. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 3812:1981. Specification for fly ash for use as pozzolana. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1981.
  16. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 456:2000. Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 2000.
  17. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2116:1980. Specification for sand for masonry mortars. Reaffirmed 1998. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1980.
  18. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 12269:2013. Ordinary Portland cement, 53-grade specification. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 2013.
  19. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2386:1963, part 3. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1963.
  20. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 383:1970. Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1970.
  21. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1077:1992. Common burnt clay building bricks specification. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1992.
  22. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 3495:1992, parts 1–4. Methods of tests for burnt clay building bricks. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1992.
  23. ASTM International. ASTM C67. Standard test methods for sampling and testing. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2020.
  24. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2250:1981. Code of practice for preparation and use of masonry mortars. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1981.
  25. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 5512:1983. Specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement and pozzolanic materials. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1983.
  26. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1905:1987. Code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1987.
  27. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 3952:1988. Specification for burnt clay hollow bricks for walls and partitions. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1988.
  28. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2185 (Part 1):2005. Concrete masonry units. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 2005.
  29. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2572:2005. Construction of hollow and solid concrete block masonry: Code of practice. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 2005.
  30. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2212:1991. Code of practice for brickwork. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1991.
  31. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2222:1991. Specification for burnt clay perforated building bricks. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1991.
  32. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 4860:1968. Specification for acid-resistant bricks. New Delhi (IN): BIS; 1968.
  33. ASTM International. ASTM C1072. Standard test methods for measurement of masonry flexural bond strength. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2021.

 Previous Article
Next Article