Residential Design as a House–Society Interface: Translating Lived Requirements into Context-Responsive Design Principles (Mlalakuwa, Dar es Salaam)

Volume: 12 | Issue: 01 | Year 2026 | Subscription
International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning
Received Date: 02/07/2026
Acceptance Date: 03/17/2026
Published On: 2026-03-25
First Page: 11
Last Page: 25

Journal Menu


By: Fortunatus Bahendwa.

Senior Lecturer, Department of Architecture, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, East Africa

Abstract

Residential architecture in rapidly urbanizing African cities often reflects standardized planning logics that assume fixed household structures and stable room functions. Yet, lived housing practices frequently reveal a different reality: dwellings evolve as sociocultural and socioeconomic requirements change over time. This article examines how user requirements are reflected through the transformation of residential plots and house layouts in Mlalakuwa, a high-demand settlement in Dar es Salaam. Drawing on field observation and mapped change narratives from 15 residential cases, the study treats post-occupancy modification as empirical evidence of “fit” (or mismatch) between initial design intentions and everyday living requirements. Findings show that transformation is widespread and patterned: most cases exhibit medium-to-very-high change intensity, largely driven by supplementary income generation through renting, changing household composition, religious practice needs, security concerns, and the need to sustain outdoor domestic life under densification. The paper then revises a socio-spatial conceptual framework that positions the house as a sociocultural construct and uses comparative typological/configurational reading to translate locally grounded dwelling logics into context-responsive design principles. The article concludes with a set of design propositions for residential layouts that can better accommodate incremental development, indoor–outdoor continuity, livelihood adaptation, and culturally shaped privacy and hospitality practices.

Keywords: User requirements, incremental housing, post-occupancy transformation, socio-cultural dwelling, rental adaptation

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Fortunatus Bahendwa Residential Design as a House–Society Interface: Translating Lived Requirements into Context-Responsive Design Principles (Mlalakuwa, Dar es Salaam). International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning. 2026; 12(01): 11-25p.

How to cite this URL: Fortunatus Bahendwa, Residential Design as a House–Society Interface: Translating Lived Requirements into Context-Responsive Design Principles (Mlalakuwa, Dar es Salaam). International Journal of Housing and Human Settlement Planning. 2026; 12(01): 11-25p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/ijhhsp/article=25178

Refrences:

  1. Tafti FF, Rollo J, McGann S. Conceptualising a model for understanding socio-cultural and spatial factors in housing: Insights from a systematic scoping review. Front Archit Res. 2025. doi: 1016/j.foar.2025.05.005
  2. Bahendwa F. The influence of users’ popular traditions in residential design: The case of Mlalakuwa settlement in Dar es Salaam city, Tanzania. J Sustain Dev. 2020;13(2):53–64. doi: 5539/jsd.v13n2p53
  3. Schneider T, Till J. Flexible housing. Architectural Press; 2007.
  4. Kombe WJ, Muheirwe F. Dar es Salaam: City report. The University of Manchester, African Cities Research Consortium; 2024.
  5. Baruah NG, Henderson JV, Peng C. Colonial legacies: Shaping African cities. J Econ Geogr. 2021;21(1):29–65.
  6. Moosavi R, Khakzand M, Kamel B. Sociocultural reflections in traditional residential architecture: A systematic review of spatial-configuration analysis. Sustainability. 2025;17(1):75. doi: 3390/su17010075
  7. Swai O. Socio-physical and environmental evaluation of courtyard space and courtyard-lifestyle in the context of coastal traditional architecture and culture: Case study of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int J Archit Eng Technol. 2017;3(2):24–36. doi: 15377/2409-9821.2016.03.02.1
  8. Baumanova M. Transitory courtyards as a feature of sustainable urbanism on the East African coast. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1759. doi: 3390/su14031759
  9. Izar P. Meanings of self-building: Incrementality, emplacement, and erasure in Dar es Salaam. Urban Plan. 2022;7(1):305–320. doi: 17645/up.v7i1.4849
  10. Pelsmakers S, Warwick E. Housing adaptability: New research, emerging practices and challenges. Build Cities. 2022;3(1):605–618. doi: 5334/bc.266
  11. Khei S, Tapiero JC, Conde O, Ortega J, Luso E, Rodrigues H, et al. Quantitative analysis of vernacular residential building typologies and bioclimatic strategies in the warm-summer Mediterranean climate: The Montesinho Natural Park as a case study. Buildings. 2024;14(8):2321. doi: 3390/buildings14082321
  12. Coşkun AÇ, Haştemoğlu HŞ. Genetic codes of housing: Morphological reading of traditional Antalya houses. Buildings. 2025;15(19):3433. doi: 3390/buildings15193433
  13. Creangă E, Ciotoiu I, Gheorghiu D, Nash G. Vernacular architecture as a model for contemporary design. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2010;128:157–171. doi: 2495/ARC100141
  14. Izar P. Meanings of self-building: incrementality, emplacement, and erasure in Dar es Salaam. Urban Plan. 2022;7(1):305–320. doi: 17645/up.v7i1.4849
  15. Abed A, Gharaibe I, Obeidat B. The impact of socio-cultural factors on the transformation of house layout: A case of public housing Zebdeh-Farkouh, in Jordan. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 2022;22(3):1195–1208. doi: 1080/13467581.2022.2074021
  16. Choi JY, Choi J. Cultural imprints on urban housing: A spatial analysis of apartment designs in Kenya, Ghana, and South Africa. Buildings. 2024;14(11):3526. doi: 3390/buildings14113526