Biotechnological Advances in Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Jute (Corchorus spp.): Genomic and Functional Insights

Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Year 2026 | Subscription
International Journal of Plant Biotechnology
Received Date: 02/06/2026
Acceptance Date: 02/09/2026
Published On: 2026-05-09
First Page: 25
Last Page: 30

Journal Menu


By: Md Al-Mamun1, T. Afroz2, M. Abdullah-Al-Mamun2, and Md. Mashiur Rahman3.

1Principal Scientific Officer, Molecular Biology Department, Genetic Resources and Seed Division, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mia Avenue, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.
2Scientific Officer, Molecular Biology Department, Genetic Resources and Seed Division, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Manik Mia Avenue, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.
3Student,College of Agricultural Sciences, International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (IUBAT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Abstract

Jute (Corchoruscapsularis and C. olitorius) is an economically significant natural bast fiber crop, particularly in Bangladesh and South Asia that faces severe constraints from salinity and waterlogging due to climate change and coastal inundation. Despite its agricultural importance, jute has historically lacked genomic resources for molecular improvement. Recent release of high‑quality reference genomes, coupled with transcriptomics and functional genomics, has enabled identification of stress‑responsive genes and regulatory networks. This review synthesizes advances in jute abiotic stress research, with emphasis on genomic discovery, transcriptional regulation, ion homeostasis, and functional insight into salinity and waterlogging tolerance. We discuss candidate gene families (WRKY, NAC, bZIP, AP2/ERF, DREB, SOS, CBL–CIPK, and NHX), their structural features, and regulatory roles. We also address how these genomic insights are being translated into biotechnological applications, including marker‑assisted breeding and CRISPR–Cas9genome editing for targeted improvement of stress tolerance. Finally, future research priorities necessary for developing resilient jute cultivars capable of maintaining fiber yield and quality under adverse environments were outlined. Furthermore, integration of multi-omics approaches, comparative genomics, and gene network modeling is highlighted as a powerful strategy to dissect complex stress tolerance mechanisms. Advancements in phenotyping platforms and functional validation tools are expected to accelerate trait discovery and deployment. Collectively, these approaches will facilitate the development of climate-resilient jute cultivars capable of sustaining productivity, fiber quality, and economic value under increasingly adverse environmental conditions.

Keywords: Abiotic stress tolerance, biotechnology, comparative genomics, corchorus, CRISPR–Cas9, jute, salinity stress, transcription factors, waterlogging

Loading

Citation:

How to cite this article: Md Al-Mamun1, T. Afroz2, M. Abdullah-Al-Mamun2, and Md. Mashiur Rahman3 Biotechnological Advances in Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Jute (Corchorus spp.): Genomic and Functional Insights. International Journal of Plant Biotechnology. 2026; 12(1): 25-30p.

How to cite this URL: Md Al-Mamun1, T. Afroz2, M. Abdullah-Al-Mamun2, and Md. Mashiur Rahman3, Biotechnological Advances in Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Jute (Corchorus spp.): Genomic and Functional Insights. International Journal of Plant Biotechnology. 2026; 12(1): 25-30p. Available from:https://journalspub.com/publication/uncategorized/article=25451

Refrences:

  1. Eswar D, Karuppusamy R, Chellamuthu S. Drivers of soil salinity and their correlation with climate change. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2021 Jun 1;50:310–8.
  2. Mitra J, Datta S. Genomic designing for abiotic stress resistance in jute. In: Genomic designing for abiotic stress resistant technical crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022 Nov 1. p. 119–155.
  3. Yang Z, Yan A, Lu R, Dai Z, Tang Q, Cheng C, et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing of two cultivated jute species under salinity stress. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185863. doi: 1371/journal.pone.0185863.
  4. Ganguly A, Amin S, Chowdhury FT, Khan H, Islam MR. Whole-genome resequencing unveils low-temperature stress tolerance-specific genomic variations in jute (Corchorus sp.). J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2024;22(2):100376. doi: 1186/s43141-024-00601-x.
  5. Shabala S, Wu H, Bose J. Salt stress sensing and early signalling events in plant roots: Current knowledge and hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38(12):2490–2506. doi: 1111/pce.12533.
  6. Mansour MMF, Hassan FAS. Salt stress-responsive proteins in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2022;108:175–224. doi: 1007/s11103-022-01239-1.
  7. Bailey-Serres J, Lee SC, Brinton E. Making sense of low oxygen sensing. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(3):129–138. doi: 1016/j.tplants.2011.12.006.
  8. Ragaey MM, El-Sayed AI, El-Sayed WS. Signaling molecules alleviate salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants (Basel). 2022;11(14):1786. doi: 3390/plants11141786.
  9. Islam MS, Hirakawa H, Tanaka T, Shimizu M, Seki M, Takagi H, et al. Comparative genomics of two jute species and insight into fibre biogenesis. Nat Plants. 2017;3:16223. doi: 1038/nplants.2016.223.
  10. Rahman K, Ahmed NU, Rana MS, Hossain MS, Khan MRI. Jute responses and tolerance to abiotic stress. Plants. 2021;10(8):1595. doi: 3390/plants10081595.
  11. Bashar KK, Tareq MZ, Kabir SMT, Hossain MS, Ahmed R, Ahmed B, et al. Comparative transcriptomics discovers the genetic basis of contrasting waterlogging tolerance between two cultivated jute species. Ind Crops Prod. 2023;199:116701. doi: 1016/j.indcrop.2023.116701.
  12. Rahman K, Rahman M, Ahmed N, Alam M, Rahman A, Islam M, et al. Morphophysiological changes and reactive oxygen species metabolism in Corchorus olitorius L. under different abiotic stresses. Open Agric. 2021;6(1):549–562. doi: 1515/opag-2021-0040.
  13. Kumar M, Prusty MR, Pandey MK, Singh PK, Bohra A, Guo B, Varshney RK. Application of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for abiotic stress management in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1157678. doi: 3389/fpls.2023.1157678.
  14. Li ZK, Xu J. Genomic and molecular insights into abiotic stress responses in rice and other cereals. Genome Biol. 2019;20:202. doi: 1186/s13059-019-1830-y.
  15. Formentin E, Baldoni E, Caproni L, Sbrana C, Mariotti D, Fabrizi S. Fast regulation of hormone metabolism contributes to salt tolerance in rice. Plants (Basel). 2018;7(3):75. doi: 3390/plants7030075.
  16. 16  You J, Chan Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01092.